My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-10-27_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2005
>
2005-10-27_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2010 11:49:07 AM
Creation date
4/15/2010 11:37:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/27/2005
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Project Name: I-35E and I-694 Commons (S.P. 6280-304) <br />III. DETERMINATION OF IMPACT RECTIFICATION (8420.0520, Subp. 5) <br />1) Has the applicant proposed to repair, rehabilitate, or restore to pre-project conditions any <br />temporary impacts associated with the project? <br />^ yes ^ no ®N/A (If no, then sequencing requirements are not met and the permit <br />cannot be approved) <br />IV. DETERMINATION OF REDUCTION OR ELIMINATION OF IMPACTS OVER TIME <br />(8420.0520, Subp. 6) <br />1) Will additional wetland impacts be reduced or eliminated by maintaining, operating, and <br />managing the project in a manner that preserves and maintains the remaining wetland functions <br />and values? <br />® yes ^ no (If no, then sequencing requirements are not met and the permit cannot be <br />approved) <br />V. UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS (8420.0520, Subp. 'n <br />1) Will unavoidable wetland impacts be replaced in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0530 to <br />8420.0630? <br />® yes ^ no (If no, then sequencing requirements are not nZet and the permit cannot be <br />approved) <br />VI. SEQUENCING FLEXIBILITY (8420.0520, Subp. 7a) <br />1) Has sequencing flexibility been requested? <br />^ yes ®no (If yes, explain compliance with MNRuIe 8420.0520, Subp. 7a) <br />Explanation: <br />2) Will the proposed replacement wetland provide equal or greater functions and values than the <br />impact wetland? <br />® yes ^ no (If no, then sequencing flexibility cannot be implemented) <br />Based on the information above, is sequencing adequately addressed? <br />® YES ^ NO <br />_, ~-> <br />~~ CX/vt~ J ~-t~i~~~ <br />Authorized LGU Official <br />o~~k ~,S" <br />Date <br />Page 1 of 1 <br />694 UWTW WCA Seq FOF.doc (December 2002) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.