Laserfiche WebLink
,~,_~ <br />-_ ~;~ <br />6 ~~F ~~rY~ <br />.~~~ <br />~: ?~Y <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />SUBJECT: <br />RECEIVED P~p~ p ~ 2QOj <br />Watershed Districts <br />Watershed Management Organizations (JPB WMO's) <br />County Local Water Planners <br />BWSR <br />November 1, 2005 <br />~~~ <br />Minnesota Lake Water Ouality Assessment Report• Developing Nutrient <br />Criteria. Third Edation. September 2005. <br />This attached Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Report serves as the technical basis for <br />Minnesota's proposed draft lake nutrient criteria. MPCA's previous Lake Water Quality Assessment <br />(LWQA) reports (1988 and 1990) were developed as a requirement for participation in Clean Lakes <br />Program (Section 314 of the Clean Water Act of 1987). The first two editions described regional <br />patterns in lake water quality in Minnesota and served as a basis for developing ecoregion-based <br />phosphorus criteria. The reports have long provided a basis for assessing the water quality of <br />Minnesota's lakes and the criteria have been used extensively for water quality goal setting. <br />As a part of the. Clean Water Action Plan of 1997, nutrients were identified as a significant national <br />problem and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was requested to develop a National Nutrient <br />Strategy. One aspect of this strategy recommended that states develop ecoregion-based criteria for <br />total phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll-a, and Secchi transparency. <br />This edition builds on the previous LWQA reports and provides a detailed description of MPCA's <br />approach for setting lake nutrient criteria. The draft criteria found in the report were developed based <br />upon multiple sources of information, including: reference lake data, statewide lake data, historic <br />reconstruction of lake water quality from fossil algae in lake sediments, lake user perceptions, fishery <br />and macrophyte requirements and other factors. Draft criteria are presented and examples of how the <br />criteria maybe used to further lake management are included in this edition. These criteria will be <br />included in the next revision of the State's water quality standards that is currently underway. <br />If you have any questions or need a copy of the report, please contact Steven Heiskary, <br />Environmental Analysis and Outcomes Division, by phone at (651) 296-7217 or (800) 657-3864 or <br />by e-mail at Steven.heiskary(a)pca.state.mn.us. Copies are also available on-line at: <br />http://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/lakectuality.html#reports . <br />cc: BWSR offices <br /> °=,2: ~f,rJ, <br />.. r, <br />_ „t J:(b ,,, <br />~ <br />~ LiiJ~T <br />~.. ,__. .. ~~aa ~y <br />}~P(.( f f~i1J~ <br />+ <br />r~.y~ <br />&E7 ~~~ ..:'.tiff.`. 1i ~. i~~I ~,.,_.~ ~#~~¢ <br />~:d^t s.~t}.. ,~~,.,.. YL+~~rYI .~.. ; ~-::_,~z~ ir. "~..~~L_1' _ f <br />___ .~t.i1v;$~.3 ~. .....'j.ictAi . <br />,~~}}~.~Zt..l~~.~~i.::~f;~~. <br />,~.;Ia ~~'fH3Y ~ _ RIl t }Q~ r~Y~i55 (tIi ''~~s 5~."a's~ .. ~"~*,~ i l i ': 'c , (l; i ~~ ,,J Fh ~ S+"~11'i~0.~ ~3 v .»1_+i <br />(}~tOA~ .,.r~t~3 ~ +f 4213 1}tf}..IL i(` ,~. <br />' ,~~+~IYL ~ ~'`} a.,;l =-~-3 ~ ~ i i'~.1 ~, FSIe'~'~ J:~;~3#fC ~7 ~ »,°•~i~?-~ _ _ '. '~ 77 t',, ~i~2f3Y3i'.-~bt ~ _ _ __ <br />zi.t I7 ~~~ t.~~~~<<7: <br />" <br />-; `} ~~~ tt tc <br />~~ s 3 ~i __ i.?1 ~ ~, :",;> l~I~ ~ -`1~~~~~~ .u:Y ~ ~)I) ~~~ ~~~%` <br />~ 7 .: 7~ S _~, ~ -£~ C. , <br />?~_ <br /> ~.. It ~. ~~* n. fir t,t ,'_1~~ .3~ ~_~- ~~ ~~ ~r-~."~ _ <br />3 . +:- t <br /> ,.~.~. ,~,~ ,.~ .,~r.~i ' i"r ~t .:_~, ~ .a vC'-M ~~ ~r~1 ~rzi~, ~Sf~y~3' P~~'sd~;~ ~r; r~~~a~! ~~3' <br />-Ci~a~.),~~. <br />~- ~ <br />