My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-01-27_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2005
>
2005-01-27_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2010 10:18:49 AM
Creation date
4/16/2010 9:51:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/27/2005
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_~`-'~ <br />O°o~D <br />n O r <br />m~=~ <br />~~Om <br />z~m~ <br />cQ1i,~m~ <br />.,z~ <br />N <br />rn <br />in <br />m <br />It r? ~`~ <br />Angie Becker Kudelka, <br />RIVER WATCH DIRECTOR, RIVERS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA <br />x <br />of <br />0 <br />L7 <br />m <br />c~ <br />N <br />rn <br />~ 3 C ~I <br />r~ lI N H <br />3 Z to N -li <br />r-i VTY "a -i n-l <br />~ ~ N n <br />zo-+r-o <br />o r- ~ ~ a <br />e-i L7 N -! <br />tJ7 I~ N ~ <br />w- o <br />w ~i 3 <br />~D 3 ~ ~ <br />N Z h r-f <br />-_ ~ tr~f- <br />-r-~_,t <br />MINNESOTA <br />ASSOCIATION <br />elcome to the first edition of <br />"Minnesota Water Watchers." You <br />are receiving this newsletter, devel- <br />oped by the Minnesota Lakes Association <br />(MLA) and the Rivers Council of Minnesota <br />(RCM), because you care about rivers and lakes <br />in Minnesota and the role citizens have in man- <br />agement of these surface water resources. <br />Contained within these pages, we plan to offer <br />specific resources to improve or expand citizen <br />volunteer monitoring programs, education on <br />various monitoring topics, current and upcom- <br />ing events, and celebration of citizen volunteers <br />by sharing their stories. <br />So, let's start with the reason this <br />newsletter has been developed. The other day I <br />was asked, "Given that we are all so busy these <br />days, why do citizens spend their time monitor- <br />ingwater?" Good question, why monitor? <br />Monitoring is a tool that helps us <br />understand more about the rivers and <br />lakes that we use. By making careful <br />observations and measurements of the <br />water important to us, we start to build <br />a base of information about the condi- <br />tion of these water bodies. <br />-1 Minnesota is lucky to have a wealth <br />of citizen resources: people that care about the <br />environment and the quality of our state's lakes <br />and rivers. Since the 1970s, citizens have been <br />actively monitoring surface water. <br />In the spring of 2002, the Minnesota <br />legislature passed a bill that encourages citizen <br />water monitoring (Minnesota Statutes 115.06, <br />subd.4.). This law takes an important step <br />towards identifying the role that water resource <br />management needs to play in both citizen and <br />state agenry purview of information. It directs <br />the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency <br />(MPCA) to encourage ambient water quality <br />monitoring by citizens and provide technical <br />assistance to citizen and local group water <br />quality monitoring efforts. The MPCA is <br />encouraged to integrate citizen monitoring data <br />into their water quality assessments and. <br />programs, provided that the data meets agency <br />quality assurance and quality control protocols. <br />In May 2004, the MPCA also submitted a <br />monitoring strategy to the Environmental <br />Protection Agenry that explained what the state <br />was doing to understand and assess the quality <br />of our waters and promoted the use of a citizen <br />constituenry to help monitor Minnesota's <br />surface waters. <br />So Why Monitor? <br />Basic water resource needs are not <br />met by government alone. We still have some <br />very basic water resource needs that aren't <br />currently being met. According to the MPCAs <br />2004 Surface Water Monitoring Legislative <br />Fact Sheet, only 8 percent of Minnesota's <br />92,000 miles of streams and 14 percent of its <br />11,900 lakes have been assessed for meeting <br />water quality standards. <br />Citizens may not know if our <br />waters are fully safe for drinking, swimming, <br />or eating the fish we catch. Inadequate <br />investment in assessing the health of lakes and <br />streams prevents state agencies, local govern- <br />ments and citizens from finding problems and <br />evaluating solutions. <br />This means that decisions are often <br />made without enough information. Local, state <br />and federal resources are expended on structures <br />and practices to improve water quality without <br />fully knowing how well those actions work. <br />Perhaps most importantly, citizens and visitors <br />of Minnesota are kept uninformed about the <br />waterways they care about and rely on. <br />MINNESOTA WATER WATCHERS NEWSLETTER WINTER 2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.