Laserfiche WebLink
STAASS ~. N ~' WA S ST CTS, C. <br />36th Annual eating Trade Show <br />P G MSC ULE <br />Thursday, November 302006 <br />3:00 p.m. Director's Meeting <br />6:00-9:00 p.m. Registration <br />7:00-9:30 p.m. MAWD Trade Show <br />7:00 - 8:00 p.m. Concurrent General Session I <br />Executive Board Room II <br />Trade Show Floor <br />Tennis Center <br />SeminarA Detailed Phosphorus Analysis -Ramsey Washington Metro WD <br />This study was intended to identify specific sources of phosphorus within the Ramsey-Washington Metro <br />Watershed District, estimate their relative contributions to surface waters, and evaluate potential manage- <br />ment implications. Together, lawns/open space, freeways, water, commercial parking lots, and residential <br />streets and roofs comprise more than 87 percent of the entire District land area. Residential streets, <br />driveways/sidewalks and freeway/railroad rights-of-way, parking lots and commercial anal industrial <br />streets combine to contribute approximately 70 percent of the total phosphorus loading within the District, <br />which provides further support for the District's proposed infiltration requirements.. <br />Presenter: Greg Wilson, P.E., Barr Eng <br />Seminar B Minnehaha Creek Visiofaing Partnership <br />The Minnehaha Creek Visioning Partnership is a joint project by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District <br />(MCWD) and the United States Corps of Engineers (USAGE). The Goal was to develop a vision that <br />could be part of a larger watershed-scale planning effort. In addition, it is intended to be used as a guide <br />for other organizations, such as cities and the Minneapolis Park Board, which share creek corridor <br />management responsibilities. This presentation will focus on the decision processes and tools used to <br />arrive at a recommended Vision, <br />Presenters: Mike Wyatt, MCWD, Kenton Spading, USAGE, <br />David Johnson, HDR <br />Seminar C Low Impact Development - Having your cake and eating it too! <br />Low Impact Development (LID) is often touted as a solution which permits growth, while maintaining <br />environmental quality -having your cake and eating it too. While there are many proponents of this <br />advancement in stormwater management, many have questioned the validity and viability of LID. <br />To address some of the doubts, fears and unanswered questions suizounding LID, this project undertook an <br />apple-to-apples comparison of three development approaches to stormwater management for the same <br />parcel. To get at comparable numbers, numerous quantitative {development cost, 30-year maintenance cost,. <br />stormwater quality and quantity performance) and qualitative measures (additional quality of life benefits) <br />were evaluated and compared across the three development scenarios. <br />Presenter: Kevin Biehn, FOR <br />~:oo P.m. elc e ice ti® - Trade ®w Fl®®r <br />