Laserfiche WebLink
having the public space to build a catch basin, so I have to believe this is a very doable <br />Engineering task. Imagine the volume of nutrient, sediment, and salt that would be <br />prevented from draining down the ramp into the lake. Either way this is an excellent <br />opportunity for the GLWMO to make a substantive contribution to water quality for Lake <br />Owasso. <br />Example 3) Why not make plans and recommendations to repair the drain at 3233 <br />Woodbridge Ave? This is a known problem where sink holes even occur in the owners <br />lot. If I understood Mr. Maloney correctly, in the July 27`h meeting, it was his <br />understanding that the drain is inactive. I can assure you when I Kayaked in the rain to <br />the culvert (that drains from 3233 Woodbridge into the lake) on Sunday August 13`h' <br />water dumps out of the culvert into the lake. I realize the City would not want to spend a <br />lot of money on this project given the street upgrade that is probably coming in 2008. <br />Nevertheless the City should do the right thing and make the obligation to make a shortly <br />term fix until the larger street project takes place. I realize space is precious in this area, <br />however, perhaps part of this project would be to seek out an innovate approach to filter <br />the run-off which does not occupy much space. <br />Example 4) This is really an extension of example 1 and 2, however, it could become a <br />project unto itself. Ramsey County use to maintain ownership of NOB -now handled by <br />the City of Shoreview (a gray area with regard to responsibility). If you went to the City <br />of Shoreview and looked for the two culverts that drain into the lake near the boat launch, <br />they are not acknowledged on their sewer maps. Though they most definitely exist and <br />they most definitely carry sediment and nutrients into the lake. The City and County <br />recently successfully worked together to secure the old County site at the northwest <br />corner of NOB and Rice Street. With a little nudge, I have to believe that the same <br />cooperative effort could occur to create a filtering system associated with the 5 drains and <br />the two culverts on NOB. <br />Example S) Rather than conduct additional water quality studies, why not glean more <br />information from previous underutilized studies. Terry Noonan will be the first to admit <br />that he has not had time to slog through the slew of data he has taken over the years. <br />Why not hire a graduate student to "data mine" Terry's spreadsheets to look for possible <br />patterns or trends. <br />Don't jump to conclusions <br />At one point during the meeting Chairman DeZellar said something to the effect "What I <br />am worried about is working with the homeowners association in attempt to get residents <br />to change their ways when talking about aquatic plant treatment". It would not make <br />sense to pose such a hypothetical question unless of course a conclusion was reached <br />prematurely. When I hear statements like that, it indicates to me that preconceived <br />notions are held and that studies are then taken interpreted to support an agenda. It <br />sounds to me like the GLWMO has a goal to have aquatic plant treatment activity on <br />Lake Owasso reduced, and looking to develop findings to support such a <br />recommendation. <br />In case you are not aware, the Lake Owasso Association board (LOA) (along with <br />thousands of residents throughout the state) and several organizations are engaged in an <br />effort to prevent the DNR from adapting an administrative rule change to reduce aquatic <br />plant treatment. The aquatic plant treatment program. for Lake Owasso is very targeted <br />2 <br />