Laserfiche WebLink
,,~ Barr Engineering Company <br />~ ~4,,~ '~ 4700 West 77th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435-4803 <br />Phone: 952-832-2600 -Fax: 952-832-2601 www.barr.com An EEO Employe <br />~'"~`~ Minneapolis, MN Hibbing, MN Duluth, MN • Ann Arbor, MI Jefferson City, MO <br />July 19, 2007 <br />Mr. Mark Maloney <br />Grass Lake Watershed Management Organization <br />4600 Victoria Street North <br />Shoreview MN X5126 <br />Re: Progress on Lake Owasso UAA 23/62-946 <br />Barr Invoice Period: May 15, 2007 through July 13, 2007 <br />Dear Mr. Maloney: <br />The enclosed invoice is for professional services, which include the following: <br />• Watershed delineations. <br />• Sediment core sampling and laboratory analysis. <br />• Coordinate Lake inflow location survey with city staff and compile collected data into a GIS map <br />illustrating the inflow locations. <br />• Field. visit to review the various inflow locations identified by the cities. <br />In addition to the work performed by Barr, the cities of Shoreview and Roseville have field collected <br />the locations of all the inflow pipes discharging to Lake Owasso. Ramsey County (Terry Noonan) <br />completed a lake macrophyte survey between May 22-30, 2007, prior to the June 4, 2007 chemical <br />treatment to control marcophytes. The County also continues to collect water quality in Lake <br />Owasso and RMWD has installed equipment at three Iocations to monitor stormwater inflows to <br />Lake Owasso. <br />The table below provides a summary of the project budgets based on the major work tasks identified <br />in the agreed upon scope of services. Overall the project is on schedule and moving forward as <br />planned. However, the development of the Lake User Survey (Task 010) did require more effort than <br />originally anticipated because of the unplanned meeting with stakeholders to collect input on the lake <br />user survey, manager's request to development of an on-line survey in addition to the mailing, and <br />additional postage related to the number of mailings. As a result, this task r'equir'ed unanticipated <br />project management and the budget for work task 010 was over spent. At the present time it appears <br />that these overruns can be compensated for by other project efficiencies on the lake sediment core <br />collection and analysis. <br />