My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-04-24_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2008
>
2008-04-24_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2010 2:59:24 PM
Creation date
4/16/2010 2:43:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/24/2008
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GLWMO MINUTES <br />JANUARY 24, 2008 <br />PAGE 8 <br />above normal in winter. <br />One graph shows treatment efficiency through ponds. Red is low efficiency; green is <br />high. Lake Emily and Lake Judy have high treatment efficiency. <br />Mogg asked if the efficiency of each pond was captured. Sobiech answered, yes. <br />Eckman asked the amount of sediment that was taken from the storm pond near Lake <br />Judy. Sobiech stated that information would be included in the updated models. It would <br />be good to know the amount of material taken from the last cleaning project. Then the <br />accumulation rate could be pro-rated. <br />Sobiech stated that using watershed models, an annual budget for phosphorous was <br />developed for Lake Owasso, as shown on the two pie charts in Figure 12. These are <br />results of in-lake water quality models. The water shed runoff models taken with the in- <br />lake models are calibrated to 2007 data for the southern site and the northern site. The <br />top chart shows that phosphorous is entering the lake from runoff. The bottom chart <br />shows the internal inload of phosphorous coming from two areas--the die-back of curly <br />leaf pond weed and the release of phosphorous from bottom sediment. <br />Ferrington noted that at the southern site almost half the watershed passes through that <br />one culvert. More than half the summer there is no discharge for half the watershed. The <br />discharge percentage for the total watershed is 52%. <br />Mogg stated that he would like to explore the possibility that leaf depositional area is a <br />contributing source at that end of the lake. This has been brought up in previous reports.. <br />Stark stated that if that is true, the yield from that watershed would be higher than the rest <br />of the watershed. <br />Schwartz stated that the watershed splits south of that half from the west. The other half <br />is from the east. Additional samples could be done. <br />Stark requested suggested that outlet by load per acre in that watershed is higher than <br />other watersheds. There is something else going on. <br />Mogg stated that the previous study did point that out. Curly leaf needs to be addressed. <br />He suggested that more samples could be taken this year to get more data and check the <br />data against the models. Sobiech agreed that it may be beneficial to continue to monitor <br />the southern site at County Road C. Stark added Dale Street. <br />Sobiech stated that tasks yet to do include looking again at the calibrations in terms of <br />volume and better assessing how the Lake Owasso outlet is performing. Look at the <br />period from 1995. Look at future land uses. A few small areas are projected to change, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.