Laserfiche WebLink
W <br />� L ' <br />1 ■ <br />UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA <br />� <br />- � � � � � <br />i • , . ; ' ,� . . � ', <br />A survey team <br />under the direction <br />of I<arlyn Ecl<man, <br />(Senior Fellow WRS) <br />and Rachel Wall<er, <br />coordinator (WRC), <br />polled Duluth's Lakeside <br />neighborhood residents <br />within a fhree-block <br />area to gauge local <br />awareness of the effects <br />of stormwater flow on <br />ys and property. <br />id Minnesota Sea Grant <br />� of Minnesota-Duluth <br />>uluth, received funding <br />. to study stormwater <br />near the Lester River/ <br />;tem. Project partners <br />�aint Louis Soil and Wa- <br />i District, the Minnesota <br />�rps, and the Minnesota <br />oastal Program. The Les- <br />Creel< system was chosen <br />as a demonstration project because it was <br />designated as "impaired" with excessive <br />turbidity from sediment. The study com- <br />pares a neighborhood retro-fitted with <br />rain barrels and rain gardens to another <br />neighborhood left "as is." <br />Respandents to the survey, called <br />I<AP for "knowledge, attitudes, and <br />practices;' seemed to be aware of links <br />between rain events, impaired watier <br />quality, and property damage. Residents <br />also understood that stormwater eventu- <br />aily reaches Lake Superior, and appeared <br />willing to participate in the Lal<eside <br />Stormwater Reduction Project. <br />Eighty-four percent of respondents in <br />the control blocl<, which is farthest down <br />the hill, said that their property and prop- <br />erties nearby were affected by stormwater <br />runoff. Fifty-two percent of residents <br />farthest up the hill in the treatment blocl< <br />reported their properties ta be affected by <br />Survey report continued on page 4 <br />Co-Director <br />1 � <br />,� <br />Professor Deb- <br />orah Swackhamer <br />returned ta her <br />position as co- <br />director of the �� <br />Water Resources <br />Center on August <br />25, 2008, after <br />serving 23 months Deb Swackhamer <br />as the Interim Director of the University <br />of Minnesota's Institute on the Environ- <br />ment (IonE). During this time, she named <br />15 Founding Fellows from across the <br />University, implemented several internaI <br />grants programs, established administra- <br />tive structure and procedures, obtained <br />the Institute's first extramural grant, cre- <br />ated a robust communications team, and <br />accepted a$2.5 millon bequeathment on <br />behalf of the Institute. <br />Provost E. lhomas Sullivan expressed <br />gratitude for Dr. Swackhamer's leader- <br />ship in creating the initial structure of the <br />IonE. <br />. ` � 1 . 1 . 1 1 . i � . ' . :�. <br />2 Director's Desk <br />3 MN Water Resources <br />Conference <br />5 White Earth Math and <br />Science Program <br />6 Community News <br />8 Paperless Minnegram <br />Sign-up <br />Minnegram <br />by Les Everett, WRC <br />For the first time, Minnesota has <br />a comprehensive fifty-year plan for <br />conserving and preserving its natural <br />resources. The Statewide Conservation <br />and Preservation Plan, prepared for the <br />Legislative-Citizen Commission on Min- <br />nesota Resources (LCCMR) by the Uni- <br />versity of Minnesota, Bonestroo, and CR <br />Planning, presents a strategic framewark <br />for protecting multiple natural resources, <br />the econamy, and public health in an <br />integrated fashion, and tal<es into account <br />demographics and climate change. It is <br />the most ambitious planning document <br />of its kind, requiring the efforts of 125 <br />scientists, natural resource planners and <br />professionals from the University and <br />public and private organizations over <br />a period of 18 months, led by Water <br />Resources Center (WRC) co-director <br />Deborah Swacl<hamer. <br />The first phase of the two-phase <br />study identifies trends in natural resource <br />conditions and the underlying drivers <br />of change. The second phase focuses on <br />four key issues: land and water habitat <br />conservation, land-use practices, trans- <br />portation, and energy production and <br />use. Within each issue area, a team of <br />experts prepared investment and public <br />policy recommendations addressing inte- <br />grated planning, critical land protection, <br />Plan, continued on page 5 <br />September 2008 <br />