Laserfiche WebLink
, ~ ~ ~.. <br />r ;/ a ~`~ ~ <br />ri ~~~ 2 ~ ~~ <br />r ~ sy <br />~,~. P,~ ~'~' r ~~ ~ ~~ <br />~ ; <br />'~ <br />-.,. - ~ <br />+~~/ ~ <br />~ ~ .-~-;: <br />} j <br />~~# '=1 <br />February ended with prospective graduate'studentsspenthng <br />time on the St. Paul and Duluth campuseslearning about the <br />Water Resources Science (WRS) program. Prospective students <br />met with faculty who share: their research interests, attended <br />formal meetings on the program's features and requirements, <br />and spent time with current WRS students to hear about life <br />in the program from the students' perspective. It was a time of <br />excitement and high energy. One young woman told me that she <br />has applied to three graduate programs across the country, but <br />that the WRS program is her first choice because it is broad and <br />deep and has a sound track record. <br />Her comment made me reflect on what makes this program so <br />special, and I have to conclude that its success is multi-faceted. <br />The young woman I spoke to mentioned that our program <br />was one of the earliest graduate programs to focus on water <br />resources. Thanks to the foresight of several faculty over ten <br />years ago, we have a robust graduate program that is training <br />our future professors, researchers, policy makers and practi- <br />tioners. The WRS program is an interdisciplinary program that <br />draws from two campuses and multiple colleges. The faculty <br />is well respected and represents the breadth of disciplines that <br />touch water resources. Students are exposed to local, state and <br />national experts, such as Dr. Pai-Yei Whung, the chief scientist <br />at the US Environmental Protection Agency, who visited the Wa- <br />ter Resources Center in January. That same day, students had <br />the opportunity to hear from an official from the US Department <br />of Agriculture.. <br />Many of you water resources partners in the public and private <br />spheres are also responsible for helping to make this graduate <br />program attractive to many top-notch students. Directly and <br />indirectly, you provide opportunities for students to engage in <br />and research water chemistry, policy, hydrology, new technolo- <br />giesfor urban and rural settings, and many other types of work. <br />Those of you who come to lecture, or invite students to learn <br />more about water resources in your sector, add to the rich <br />experience of our students. Many times when I am at off-campus <br />meetings, I am aware that various initiatives being discussed <br />include research by WRS students and faculty. The fact the Min- <br />nesota has a strong reputation in managing its water resources <br />increases students' desire to come to Minnesota to study. <br />So as students consider applying to the WRS program, they <br />clearly take into account the high quality of faculty and research <br />facilities. They also know they are coming to a program strength- <br />ened by sound partnerships in the greater Minnesota water <br />resources community. <br />_ ~ `~1~2// Faye Sleeper <br />~~~G ~. WRC co-director <br />U <br />WRC Grants, continued from page 1 <br />receives direct wastewater discharge. PIs Matt Simcik (Environmen- <br />tal Health Sciences) and John Gulliver (Civil Engineering) hypoth- <br />esize that a significant sow-ce of PFCs to surface waters is m-ban <br />stormwater, which receives PFCs from commercial, industriat and <br />residential sources within the watershed. They propose to sample <br />temporal composites of urban stormwater integrated over storm <br />events and analyze the samples for a suite of PFCs. These PFC con- <br />centrations will be combined with detailed land-use information for <br />the watershed to model the source apportionment of PFCs to urban <br />stormwater. Objectives of this study are to quantify the magnitude <br />of PFCs loading from urban stormwater, to identify unique land-use <br />characteristics that lead to PFC contamination, and to determine the <br />efficacy of suspended sediment removal as a technique for removing <br />PFCs from storm-eater. <br />Reductive degradation of pesticides: Solid-state and <br />solution-phase dynamics <br />Groundwater is contaminated by many human activities, including <br />intentional and accidental releases of pesticides and leaching of pesti- <br />cides from sites of application into subsurface soils. Many pesticides <br />are amenable to degradation by way of abiotic reductive degradation, <br />and many degradation reactions occur at the mineral-water inter- <br />face. William Arnold (Civil Engineering) and Lee Penn (Chemistry) <br />propose to quantify the changes in mineralogy of sediment samples <br />caused by reductive transformation of selected pesticides and quan- <br />titatively link these solid-state changes to the evoh~ing kinetics of <br />contaminant degradation. They hypothesize that natural sediments <br />under reducing conditions continuously exposed to oxidized con- <br />taminants develop apseudo-steady-state reactivity. The study uses a <br />combination of batch and column experiments in which the kinetics <br />of pesticide reduction are quantified and changes in mineralogy are <br />also quantified using a variety of solid-state characterization tech- <br />niques. Quantifying pseudo-steady-state reactivity will determine <br />potential for long-term contaminant attenuation. <br />Fate and bioavailability of litter mercury in Minnesota <br />streams and rivers <br />Mercury (Hg) contamination is found in many aquatic habitats <br />worldwide. Com•ersion of inorganic Hg to monomethyhnercury <br />(MeHg) represents the most important process in regulating the <br />bioavailability of Hg and subsequent Hg concentrations found in <br />top predators within food webs. The majority of previous research <br />on environmental regulation of Hg bioavailability focused on the <br />methylation of Hg in sediments. New evidence shows that non-sed- <br />imentary compartments, such as periphyton and leaf litter, function <br />as important sites for MeHg production in aquatic ecosystems. Leaf <br />litter from riparian zones may play an important role in stream <br />Hg dynamics because leaf litter is a primary source of energy and <br />nutrients to river food webs in the temperate region. Litter is also <br />an important source of Hg derived fi-om the atmosphere during the <br />growing phase. Hg deposits on leaves during the growing season, <br />and then leaf litter delivers Hg to the forest floor. PIs Jacques Finlay <br />(Ecology Evolution and Behavior) and Edward Nater (Soil, Water, <br />and Climate) recently demonstrated that stream water chemistry <br />and litter species can influence Hg release and subsequent methyla- <br />tion of Hg in litter in laboratory incubation experiments. These <br />results suggest that water quality variation as well as riparian tree <br />species within and among streams and rivers may influence the <br />Continued on page 3 <br />-_ _- -- _ <br />-` -- -- <br />d~ ~ ~ Y'd1Y1 _- - ____ ~'' <br />