Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, March 8, 2010 <br />Page 15 <br />it was anon-revenue generatin activit even thou h t <br />g y, g he City had seen mayor ac- <br />complishments over the last 10 years with afull-time position at a cost of approx- <br />imately $100,000 annually. Mr. Trudgeon further addressed the City's pioneering <br />of GIS capabilities and partnering with other communities (i.e., No. St. Paul), but <br />also finding declining revenues. Mr. Trudgeon noted that if current trends contin- <br />ue, choices were necessary to cut back on services. Mr. Trudgeon noted that one <br />thought was to fund code enforcement differently, through the General Fund; <br />however, he noted that the reality of that happening with other draws was not <br />probable. <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that the department was a "people" department, rather than <br />equipment or supply driven, and had cut costs as much as possible without finding <br />other revenue sources or reducing staffing. Mr. Trudgeon noted that this was a <br />much more serious and broad issue, and needed serious discussion in the future. <br />Additional discussion included other revenue sources for potential exploration, <br />such as an increased HRA levy, establishment of an Economic Development Au- <br />thority (EDA); promoting and connecting with community businesses; possible <br />creation of a Chamber of Commerce; additional loan programs through an EDA• <br />various models for an EDA and bonding ability; potential tapping. of Tax Incre~ <br />ment Financing (TIF) Districts for administrative costs, from a narrow and limited <br />. perspective, with minimal revenue; and potential tapping of former sewer access <br />charges (SAC) from the Metropolitan Council on a one-time basis due to a change <br />in their credit collections. <br />Mayor Klausing requested additional information from Mr. Trudgeon on SAC. <br />Further discussion included inclusion of the Community Development Depart- <br />ment in the 2011 budget process, even though it is not a tax revenue-supported <br />department; prioritization of the department's activities similar to other tax reve- <br />nue-supported departments. <br />b. Finance Department Presentation on Imagine Roseville 2025 Topics <br />Councilmember Johnson requested delay in discussing this item until a future <br />meeting to allow more time for discussion. <br />Mr. Miller advised that the Finance Department presentation could be included on <br />the March 29, 2010 meeting. <br />By consensus, Councilmembers concurred. <br />14. City Manager Future Agenda Review <br />Acting City Manager Miller briefly reviewed upcoming agenda items for the March 22, <br />• 2010 meeting. <br />