Laserfiche WebLink
1) The following recommendation was made on March 2°d, 2010 by the Roseville <br />Parks and Recreation Commission as it relates to towers in city parks: <br />General Conditions for Policv on Towers in City Parks• <br />• Shall be considered on a case by case basis and must be consistent with the Parks and <br />Recreation Master Plan <br />• Proposal must be a direct infrastructure benefit to the park <br />• Proposal must be a direct benefit to all park users <br />• Each case shall be referred to the Parks and Recreation Commission for review and <br />recommendation <br />• Each proposal shall involve community and neighborhood input meetings <br />• Park must be appropriate size to support a commercial use <br />• Co-location is not recommended in a city park because of the height and space <br />requirement that are dictated <br />• A building shall not be allowed unless there is a possibility for dual use, i.e., <br />restroom/community room facilities etc.? <br />• Agreement shall include a provision to remove pole/equipment and restore area should <br />provider go away where there is no longer a need, i.e. letter of credit or bond <br />• Each case shall require a visual impact assessment (visual impact statement) <br />• All installation and restoration costs shall be borne by the provider with no cost to the city <br />• Appropriate compensation shall be received by the City <br />The motion was made by Commissioner Etten that the above general conditions be recommended to <br />the City Council when considering towers in city parks, seconded by Willmus. Motion approved 7-1 <br />with Commissioner Ristow voting no. <br />Present: Brodt Lenz, Etten, D.Holt, M.Holt, Pederson, Ristow, Stark and Chair Willmus <br />Absent: Hiber, Youth Commissioner Jacobson <br />2) The following recommendation was made on March 2°d, 2010 by the Roseville <br />Parks and Recreation Commission as it relates to a tower in Acorn Park: <br />Monopole (data only)' <br />• Installation shall be consistent with the park plan and not exceed the following criteria: <br />o Dimension of pole similar to existing light or telephone poles (X dimension) <br />o Height of pole shall not exceed 100 ft. <br />o Ground space shall not exceed 7 x 7 ft <br />• Installation shall prefer combination use with park amenity, i.e. attached to replaced light <br />pole <br />• Installation, maintenance and operation shall not interfere with park activities and shall be <br />scheduled with the Parks and Recreation Department <br />• Screening shall be defined by the Parks and Recreation Department <br />• Perform a visual impact assessment (visual impact statement) <br />• Agreement shall include a provision to remove pole/equipment and restore area should <br />provider go away where there is no longer a need, i.e. letter of credit or bond <br />