Laserfiche WebLink
Further discussion included how to make Roseville fun (i.e., educational <br />environmental opportunities throughout the community's trail system, historic <br />markers); minimum impact design standard protocols; LEED standards; <br />addressing any city-supported funding of development/redevelopment by their use <br />of LEED standards; safety issues for uncontrolled crosswalks (Section S.A.S.b) <br />and timing for those activated lights; visibility issues at the Central Park Victoria <br />Trail crossing and unsuccessful attempts to fund it over the last 2-3 years; <br />consideration of implementation of additional roundabouts (Section 11.A. l.a); <br />and implementation of certain amenities considered as a standard in day-to-day <br />operations of the department. <br />Members requested that any future drafts include page numbers for easier <br />reference. <br />8. Public Works Budget /Program Overview <br />Mr. Schwartz provided a brief review of the 2010 Public Works Budget/Program <br />Overview and breakdown as included in tonight's agenda packet materials, as it <br />related to the Budgeting for Outcomes (BFO) process and revisions from its initial <br />implementation in 2009, and recently-completed time spent profiles and <br />allocation to each category. Mr. Schwartz noted that the Public Works <br />Department, since the 1980's, had tracked those allocations through the use of 30- <br />40 time sheet job codes during a given day, making implementation of the BFO <br />process easier to implement. Mr. Schwartz noted that each category and/or level <br />had certain organizational supervision, management, budgeting, and allocated <br />employees attributable to each. Mr. Schwartz further noted that the department is <br />creating performance measurements in as many areas as possible, similar to the <br />twenty (20) year tracking for the Pavement Management Program (PMP), in <br />addition to measuring customer complaints. Mr. Schwartz spoke in support of the <br />department's process, allowing the City Council to make decisions based on not <br />just dollars, but actual services and programs for the department, as well as <br />providing a better way to measure effectiveness of the City's limited resources, <br />both financial and personnel. <br />10. Agenda for Next Meeting - Apri127, 2010 <br />• Intersection Needs Improvements Discussion <br />Member Stenlund requested scheduling a Saturday meeting for a tour of <br />problem intersections in lieu of a regular meeting, and inviting representatives <br />of the Roseville Citizens League (RCL), in order to actually observe <br />problematic intersections, specifically those with the highest safety priorities. <br />Member Gjerdingen suggested video taping the tour for public information by <br />delayed broadcast. <br />Chair DeBenedet suggested that the meeting be convened at City Hall, then <br />the tour, and meeting back at City Hall to allow the public to hear the <br />discussion on cable. <br />