Laserfiche WebLink
Appendix B <br />Table 10 <br />Comparison of Material Compositions by Weight <br />Single Stream -Dual Stream Routes <br />October <br />Material Category <br />Average Weight (Pounds) <br />Single Stream Dual Stream <br />(Monday) (Wed - Friday)z <br />Paper 9,327 <br />Metals 291 <br />Glass 690 <br />Plastic 594 <br />Contaminants 1,199 <br />5,599 <br />637 <br />1,695 <br />691 <br />264 <br />Total ~ 12,101 ~ 8,886 <br />~ The weights were estimated by applying the median percentages from the sorting <br />events to the average of the pilot route truck tonnages. <br />s The weights from Tuesday's routes were excluded from the comparison because they <br />represent weekly collection, whereas the Wednesday, Thursday and Friday routes <br />provided more comparable data as they were collected bi-weekly. <br />The results of comparing the single stream and dual stream collection methods in <br />September and October include: <br />The single stream routes yielded increased quantities of paper compared to the <br />dual stream routes. <br />The single stream routes generated less quantities of metals, glass and plastics <br />than the dual stream routes. <br />The quantities of contaminants in the single stream routes were higher than the <br />quantities of contaminants found in the dual stream routes. <br />No conclusions are drawn as to the magnitude of the differences by weight because <br />the weights represent only the median percentages. <br />Table 11 below shows a comparison of the four single stream routes to the six dual <br />stream routes during the pilot (September and October). <br />B-10 B~~os <br />