Laserfiche WebLink
That leaves approximately $900 million in total <br />for congestion mitigation projects through 2030, <br />or about $55 million annually. <br />This reality requires a new approach to man- <br />agingcongestion inthe metropolitan highway <br />system, which is what the MHSIS will begin to <br />address. <br />~, 11CQ~8 ~frafe~~g sCl' ~~I~~Et~c`t.j~` flt~~G~~ri~Cl~~ <br />The challenges of managing the metropolitan <br />highway system call fora 21st century solu- <br />tionthat istechnology-based, multi-modal, and <br />problem-focused, with an emphasis on system- <br />widemanagement. <br />Rather than focusing on building capacity alone, <br />the new strategy will focus on improvements <br />that build on existing management strategies <br />and provide relief to identified problem areas <br />throughout the system. <br />• Managed lanes (either conversion or expansion), <br />such as the MnDOT MnPASS lanes, where rush- <br />hourtraffic islimited tohigh-occupancy vehicles <br />(carpools and buses), motorcycles, and single- <br />occupantvehicles willing to pay a toll to use the <br />lane. <br />• Additional active traffic management techniques, <br />such as the existing ramp meter, sign-messag- <br />ing, traffic volume detection, traffic camera sys- <br />tem, and new technologies. <br />• Strategic capacity enhancement projects, includ- <br />ing projects to extend lanes or otherwise add <br />capacity in specific locations to ease bottlenecks. <br />Includes lower-cost, high-benefit projects, where <br />a smaller scale, more affordable project to re- <br />movebottlenecks orimprove traffic flow can help <br />congestion. <br />• Access management for Interregional Corridors <br />(IRCs), which involves limiting private access <br />and managing public access to these highways. <br />State Road Construction Program Funding <br />Through 2030 <br />(Metro-Area Allocations, in millions) <br />Bridges <br />$1,290 <br />Communil <br />Coopera~ <br />Team Transit /Other Safety <br />$19015% <br />Pavement and <br />"" 'reservation <br />OM136% <br />The State Road Construction Program for the Twin Cities metro area through 2030 will include about $900 <br />million for congestion mitigationlcapacity projects, or less than 25 percent of the total investment. <br />(IRCs provide signficant connections between <br />regions of the state, particuarly for freight traf- <br />fic.)The state, working with county and local <br />governments, will manage access to optimize <br />the performance of the existing routes. New <br />public access, or newlreconstructed inter- <br />changes toexpand capacity to meet safety <br />concerns, will only be considered if they are <br />consistent with MnDOT's criteria and adopted <br />regional priorities. <br />• In addition, staff are examining other types of <br />projects on the system, including resurfacing <br />and replacement projects. Potential congestion <br />relief strategies will also be examined as part <br />of preservation projects to assure the greatest <br />benefit for the resources expended. <br />Active Traffic Management <br />Techniques <br />The Twin Cities region has used so-called <br />Active Traffic Management techniques for <br />many years to improve traffic safety and <br />make the highway system operate as effi- <br />ciently as possible. Examples include; <br />• Cameras <br />• Traffic volume detectors <br />• Ramp meters <br />• Changeable message signs <br />•High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) and Mn- <br />PASS lanes <br />• Bus-only shoulders <br />• 511 traveler information <br />• Freeway Incident Response and Safety <br />Team (FIRST) <br />In the future, technologies such as queue <br />warning (alerting drivers to an incident or <br />congestion up ahead) and dynamic re-routing <br />(providing an alternate route to avoid con- <br />gestion)will also be part of the metro region <br />strategies. <br />The Urban Partnership Agreement (UPA) project, that <br />brought $133 million in federal funds for congestion relief <br />in the I-35W corridor, shows how several dif ferent strate- <br />gies can be used to address issues in one corridor. Pictured <br />above is a MnPASS lane with motorist information signs to <br />indicate incidents ahead. <br />Specifically, the MHSIS will produce potential so- <br />lutionsthat may provide improvements for sys- <br />tem-wide benefit, These solutions will be ranked <br />according to defined principles, including specific <br />methods for measuring performance, and will <br />provide a reservoir of projects to draw from if ad- <br />ditionalfinancial resources become available. <br />study pl'ogre~~ and related eftc~~ <br />The MHSIS began in late 2009; with a review of <br />methods other major metropolitan areas are us- <br />ing toaddress congestion. Work is underway to <br />analyze various strategies and apply established <br />performance measurements, including how a <br />particular strategy addresses safety, congestion, <br />ability to move people, and cost. <br />The study will be completed in early summer, <br />which is when draft amendments to the Trans- <br />portation Policy Plan will begin to move through <br />the Transportation Advisory Board's committees. <br />METRO HIGHWAY SYSTEM INVESTMENT STUDY ~ METRO HIGHWAY SYSTEM INVESTMENT STUDY <br />Congestion Mitigation <br />Safety Capacity <br />$900 / 24% <br />