My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-05-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2010
>
2010-05-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2010 9:37:14 AM
Creation date
5/24/2010 9:24:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/25/2010
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Further discussion included whether newsletter articles were appropriate <br />requesting assistance from citizens; does the community consider itself urban <br />enough to take care of its sidewalks; width of sidewalks and pathways and <br />ultimate maintenance costs; citizen concerns raised for businesses not keeping <br />their sidewalks cleared for their customers; need to update the snow removal <br />policy provided on the City's website to make sure people are well-informed; and <br />specific areas of concern for those low-lying areas and ice build up. <br />Mr. Schwartz advised that commercial properties are responsible for ice control; <br />and members suggested a reminder to them from staff. <br />Further discussion included enforcement by the City's Community Development <br />Department for compliance of commercial properties; human nature; citizen <br />complaints driving enforcement; and the need for the Parks and Recreation as <br />well as the Community Development Departments to he notified when there are <br />areas of concern. <br />Member Stenland noted that pathways"-and sidewalks were designed for summer, <br />not winter; and addressed related issues with stoi~nwater runoff; impervious <br />surfaces; and the typical Minnesota winter. Member Stenland suggested a high <br />school class project addressing wintertime design and how to solve some of those <br />prevalent issues; and noted the availability of high school students for snow <br />removal. <br />Further discussion included sidewalk design and rights-of--way limitations; snow <br />clearing zones; the City's general snow plowing procedures based on resource <br />challenges of the last few years; and the various jurisdictions impacted (state, <br />county and city). <br />It was the consensus of members that additional public information and education <br />was needed on the City's website, as well as the process for reporting those areas <br />observed out-of-compliance. <br />Mr. Schwartz advised that he would pass that information along to the Parks and <br />Recreation Deparhnent. <br />Chair DeBenedet recessed the meeting at 7:47 p.m. and reconvened at 7:53 p.m. <br />7. Metropolitan Council Proposed Second Generation Inflow/Infiltration <br />Program <br />Mr. Schwartz provided an update to the Commission on a metropolitan-wide task <br />force on which he'd been serving over the last six (6) months related to second <br />generation inflow and infiltration. Mr. Schwartz noted that this group, working <br />with the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Division, was made up of <br />city stakeholders in an effort to reduce inflow and infiltration of clear water into <br />the sanitary sewer systems, requiring treatment. <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.