Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Apportionment: <br /> <br />*(1) Ex W 680.01 ft of S <br />1024 ft & ex W 700 ft N <br />thereof & ex beg 1608.5 ft <br />NEly from W Une of NW~q on <br />a line par with & 100 ft <br />SEly at nA fro~ NP R/w; th <br />s ~23.87 ft; th E at RA <br />4CO ft; th N to inters~et <br />sd par line; th S~ly to <br />beg; part of sd I.;' 81 Y of <br />sd ll/.'i 8, 'i:ly of Mi nn Tfr <br />R/'l. subj to Rd, :\..n See 8, <br />T /\; J R 23. <br /> <br />(2) N 320.3 ft of S 1344.3 <br />f t of VI 7CO ft of tIN"" of <br />See 8, T 29. R 23. <br /> <br />$2,000.00 <br /> <br />(3) Ex 3 1344.j ft; the W <br />700 ft of part of NWL~i, S <br />of N PRy R/w, tn Sec. 8, <br />T 29, R 23. <br /> <br />* Note: Assessment on (1) paid <br />in full. <br /> <br />1.,880.CO <br /> <br />Original Assessment: <br /> <br />Subj to Hwy 8. esmts; the <br />N 250 ft of S 466 ft of <br />V '-', of NW I,~ of See 11, <br />T 29, R 23 <br /> <br />3,332.50 <br /> <br />No. 244 <br /> <br />/..pportlonl'l'ent: <br /> <br />New <br />Lot 1 <br />Lot <br />Lot <br />Let <br />L0t <br />Lot <br />t<,t <br />L(>t <br />Lot <br />Let <br />lot <br /> <br />., <br />L - <br /> <br />8lock 1 <br />Block I <br />Bloc k I <br />Rlock 1 <br />Bloc k 1. <br />m oc I: 1 <br />Block 1 <br />910ck 1. <br />B1.ock 1 <br />Block 1 <br />Block 1 <br /> <br />200.00 <br />252.50 <br />587.50 <br />120.00 <br />160.00 <br />120.00 <br />160.00 <br />120.00 <br />:,75. (;0 <br />5l2.5C <br />525.00 <br /> <br />Plat - Plc~hartl Addition <br /> <br />3 - <br />4 - <br /> <br />':) - <br />6 - <br />7 - <br />8 - <br />9 .. <br />lO- <br />ll- <br /> <br />The Village Clerk of the Village of Rosevllle is hereby <br /> <br />authorized to prepare a certified copy of this resolution and to <br />certify the same to the County ^uditor of Ramsey County, Minnesota. <br />The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was <br /> <br />duly seconded by <br /> <br />ShinldR <br /> <br />. and upon vote being <br /> <br />taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: (5) <br />and the following voted against the same: (0) <br />wh~r~lJr()n !=:i'lid rf'solution was d.-elared dIlly rn~Sf\rl M""~ n,4t"'rt"'d. <br />