Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, May 24, 2010 <br />Page 9 <br />Larry Leiendecker, 983 Larpenteur Avenue W, Attorney <br />Mr. Leiendecker's written comments we included in the RCA through a letter of <br />appeal dated April 26, 2010 (Attachment A); as well as an e-mail dated May 21, <br />2010, provided as a bench handout, responding to RCA documents. Mr. Leien- <br />decker verbally reviewed the points from those comments, alleging that the ad- <br />ministration determination was not based on aquasi-public use determination, as <br />nothing in the letter to North Como Presbyterian Church (NCPC) from Associate <br />Planner Bryan Lloyd indicated that such a low impact decision was made, as well <br />as nothing in the subsequent a-mail from the Department to Ms. Kimberly Spear. <br />Mr. Leiendecker opined that if the religious nature of the church were removed, it <br />would be anon-profit operating in a business district, on R-1 land and needing to <br />abide by those rules. <br />Marty Marchio, 962 West Larpenteur Avenue (directly across from pro- <br />posed garden) <br />Mr. Marchio's written comments were provided as a bench handout. Mr. Mar- <br />chio opined that he had always maintained a good relationship with NCPC, with <br />rio previous problem, even with the number of businesses run from the church. <br />Mr. Marchio provided photos, also included in his written comments; expressing <br />concerns with the visual impact in this gateway to Roseville; liability concerns; <br />on-site storage; actual number of garden plots intended; and number of "em- <br />ployees" to plant and maintain the gardens. Mr. Marchio opined that the first step <br />in the church considering such a public use should have been involving the neigh- <br />bors early in the planning process. <br />Kimberly Spear, 1509 Pascal Street N; member and representative of NCPC, <br />and close neighbor <br />Ms. Spear's written comments were included in the packet materials (Attachment <br />C. Ms. Spear provided a history of this community garden process to-date from <br />the church's perspective, with her originally asked by their Pastor to lead a plan- <br />ning committee to review feasibility of bringing a community garden to their <br />property, as part of their efforts to renew and revitalize their congregation and the <br />church community. Ms. Spear noted receipt of nominally grant funds, and the <br />Pastor's charge for this committee to: look at the feasibility of a community gar- <br />den; determine if it was something that could be done; whether there was suffi- <br />cient church property available; is it sustainable by the church; and did it make <br />sense at that location. Ms. Spear advised that the committee toured other com- <br />munity gardens throughout the metropolitan area, and found many different varie- <br />ties and the potentials. At that time, the committee presented their findings to the <br />NCPC congregation in the fall of 2009, with three different efforts identified for <br />the community garden: congregation, neighborhood, and outreach, in that order. <br />Ms. Spear noted that their congregation was small, but that they received a com- <br />mitment from a small group of the congregation to participation in the food shelf <br />portion, but that there had been little interest in the congregation portion of a gar- <br />den; therefore moving them forward more quickly than intended to the communi- <br />