CC_Minutes_2010_0712 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, July 12, 2010 Page 11 Councilmember Roe opined that it may make sense to keep options open for fu- ture clean up costs, but that it didn't seem prudent to pursue such analysis for cur- rent infrastructure projects. Mayor Klausing and Councilmember Johnson concurred with Councilmember Roe's comments. b. Discuss Adoption of a new Official Zoning Map Community Development Director Patrick Trudgeon introduced this discussion, noting that development of the proposed zoning map land use designations was not a simple task, and had uncovered many interesting issues during alot-by-lot analysis. Mr. Trudgeon noted that the purpose of this discussion was to introduce the zoning map to Councilmembers, and that action was not sought tonight, but would be sought later in the fall, following additional City Council and public feedback. City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed background information detailing the Metropolitan Council's view of future growth for Roseville within the region and impacts to various plans and its own "System Statement," resulting in the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan dated in the fall of 2009. Mr. Paschke noted that the next step, in accordance with requirements of Minnesota State Statutes, Section 473.864, subdivision 2, was an update of the City's Zoning Regulations (Title 10 of Roseville City Code) and Official Zoning Map for its consistency with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Paschke reviewed proposed consolidations and zoning district names as guided by the adopted Comprehensive Plan, as detailed in the RCA dated July 12, 2010. Mr. Paschke reviewed four items in which staff was seeking further direction from the City Council, as detailed in Section 3.0 of the RCA. Mr. Paschke advised that in Section 3.0 (a), there was one additional anomaly property to be added, making the total 68 based on written observations and comments previously received from Councilmember Roe, specifically the MnDOT property north of the proposed location for the cell tower on Rice Street, currently zoned as LDR-1 (single-family) which seemed inappropriate and possi- blymore suited for Institutional designation. Mr. Paschke addressed the zoning identified on past zoning maps at Har Mar Mall and Comprehensive Plan guidance for Community Business (CB); and additional information provided by the public related to subsequent Planning Commission recommendation that those properties remain designated as CB. Mr. Paschke addressed the Planning Commission recommendation for 2025 County Road B near the Midland Grove Condominiums for a designation higher than LDR (low-density residential).