My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_0628
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_0628
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2010 10:30:33 AM
Creation date
7/26/2010 10:30:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/28/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•Margaret Driscoll ~n C ~ 7-ri( yt , of - ~la$/~o <br />From: support@civicplus.com <br />~nt: Saturday, June 26, 2010 9:53 PM <br />o: '`RVCouncil; Margaret Driscoll; Bill Malinen <br />Subject: Subdivision of 2218 Hwy 36/Lefebvre_Silflow Online Form Submittal: Contact City Council <br />The following form was submitted via your website: Contact City Council <br />Subject: Subdivision of 2218 Highway 36 <br />Name:: Paul Lefebvre, Carolyn Silfllow <br />Address:: 2230 Marion Rd. <br />City:: Roseville <br />State: MN <br />Zip:: 55113 <br />How would you prefer to be contacted? Remember to fill in the corresponding contact <br />information.: Email <br />Home•Phone Number:: 651 639-0141 <br />Daytime Phone Number:: 612 624-4706 <br />ail Address:: si1f1001@umn.edu <br />Please Share Your Comment, Question or Concern: Dear Council members: <br />This is a reply sent to Mayor Klausing and Manson Hills neighbors to continue the discussion <br />of subdivision of 2218 Highway 36, to be considered at Monday's Council Meeting. <br />Dear Mayor Klausing: <br />Thank you for your reply to our letter-concerning subdividing the property at 2218 Highway <br />36. We appreciate your comments and the time you took to address our concerns. We are <br />replying to you with a cc to other neighbors, as we will not be able to make the meeting <br />Monday night. We are not forwarding your a-mail, as it was directly addressed to us, but <br />will try to quote or paraphrase your comments accurately. <br />We are still convinced that subdividing this property will have real environmental and <br />economic costs for this neighborhood, and will briefly reinforce those concerns in reply to <br />your comments. <br />First, you pointed out that what is being sought is not a variance to the code. If the owner <br />were seeking a variance there would have to be a legal basis to do so. Instead, the owner is <br />seeking to subdivide one larger lot into three smaller lots that still meet the requirements <br />for lot size in Roseville. We did misunderstand that this action is not a variance. The <br />"default state" would be to allow the subdivision. On the other hand, input from the <br />neighbors was solicited, so we assume that you and the Council really did want to hear our <br />~cerns. If the permission to subdivide is automatic, and out of your hands, why were we <br />nt several mailings soliciting input? Our only conceivable input, not being experts on <br />Roseville planning law, would be to outline the damage that would be done to our neighborhood <br />if this subdivision is allowed to occur. That damage is real, and it is grounds to ask our <br />i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.