My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_0719
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_0719
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2010 12:43:01 PM
Creation date
8/3/2010 12:43:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/19/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, July 19, 2010 <br />Page 9 <br />12. Business Items (Action Items) <br />a. Consider City Abatement for Unresolved Violations of City Code at 1430 <br />County Road C <br />Mayor Klausing noted that this item had been removed by staff as matters had <br />been resolved. <br />b. Consider City Abatement for Unresolved Violations of City Code at 2390 <br />Cohansey Street <br />Permit Coordinator Munson reviewed the request for abatement as detailed in the <br />RCA dated July 19, 2010; providing a visual update on the property as of today of <br />this single-family, detached home currently owned and occupied by Ryan and <br />Heidi Myrold. <br />Mr. Munson summarized the proposed abatement, consisting of a deteriorated <br />fence around the swimming pool; and deteriorated soffits on the home estimating <br />that a total abatement cost of approximately $5,000.00. Mr. Munson advised that <br />the complaint originated with the Neighborhood Enhancement Program (NEP) <br />process; and that the owners had stated they would not be doing any repairs as the <br />home is currently in foreclosure. <br />Staff recommended that the Community Development Department be authorized <br />to abate the unresolved City Code violations at 2390 Cohansey Street. <br />Discussion included the process for recovery of abatement costs for properties in <br />foreclosure, through work of staff with various mortgage companies and home- <br />owners or through assessment on property taxes as part of disclosures during clos- <br />ing for new owners; use of youth and volunteers through area agencies to assist <br />homeowners; and how staff bids out projects depending on the extent and exper- <br />tise of work to be completed, as well as timing constraints; and how interested <br />contractors could get on the list of bidders by contacting City Hall. <br />Klausing moved, Roe seconded, directing staff to abate the above-referenced pub- <br />lic nuisance violation at 2390 Cohansey Street by hiring general contractors to re- <br />pair and repaint the fence around the swimming pool and soffits on the home as <br />detailed in RCA dated July 19, 2010, at an estimated cost of approximately <br />$5,000.00; and further directing that the property owner be billed for all actual <br />and administrative costs; and if those charges remain unpaid, staff is to recover <br />costs as specified in City Code, Section 407.07B; with costs to be reported to the <br />City Council following the abatement. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Roe; Pust; Ihlan; and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.