My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009_1116_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2009
>
2009_1116_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 3:27:44 PM
Creation date
8/9/2010 4:37:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment E <br />Commissioner Boerigter, while sympathetic to the plight of the applicant, noted that the overall height to midpoint <br />: of the roof was not beyond current Code, and only the wall height above the nine feet (9') allowed was the issue. <br />: Commissioner Boerigter questioned the purpose of that provision, if it was due to the building looking that much <br />: higher with higher walls. However, Commissioner Boerigter concurred that this didn't equate to a defined hardship <br />: that would justify granting the variance. Commissioner Boerigter questioned if this portion of the City Code should <br />: be reviewed for further refinement. <br />: Commissioner Boerigter spoke in support of the Conditional Use, but spoke in opposition to the Variance; and <br />: suggested that the applicant pursue alternatives to accommodating the motor home with a nine foot (9') wall and <br />E midpoint roof at fifteen feet (15'). While unfortunate, Commissioner Boerigter advised that he could not support <br />E deviating from the current code. <br />E Commissioner Wozniak spoke in support of the Conditional Use, but in opposition to the Variance, and echoed <br />E Commissioner Boerigter's observations; while recognizing the applicant's attempt to remove an eyesore, he could <br />E not find evidence of a hardship to support the Variance. <br />MOTION <br />Member Boerigter moved, seconded by Member poherty to RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL <br />APPROVAL a CONDITIONAL USE for Richard Martin, 2970 Mildred Avenue; based on the comments and <br />findings of Section 6, and the conditions of Section 7 of the staff report dated November 16, 2009. <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />7 MOTION <br />7 Member poherty moved, seconded by Member Cook to RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL DENIAL of <br />7 the Variance requested by Richard Martin, 2970 Mildred Avenue; based on the comments and findings of <br />7 Section 5 of the staff report dated November 16, 2009. <br />7 Ayes:6 <br />7 Nays:O <br />7 Motion carried. <br />7 Chair poherty noted that the case was scheduled to be heard by the City Council at their November 16, 2009 <br />f ineeting. <br />f Commissioner Wozniak spoke in support of including this portion of City Code in the overall review of the City's <br />f Zoning Code, for possible modification. <br />City Planner Paschke advised that he had duly noted that suggestion; and encouraged additional comment from <br />individual Commissioners on areas throughout the code needing improvement, modification or consistency of <br />which they were aware. <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.