My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_0726
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_0726
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2010 10:26:15 AM
Creation date
8/16/2010 10:24:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/26/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, July 26, 2010 <br />Page 14 <br />Councilmember Ihlan suggested that this particular location in District No. 11 <br />should be considered for future guidance, since the building is currently va- <br />cant and the site is developable. <br />Mayor Klausing requested that Councilmember Ihlan define "guidance." <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that this was an abstract conversation, with an <br />opportunity available for a vacant site to guide it for housing or mixed use; <br />while not saying that should an industrial use come in, that the Comprehen- <br />sive Plan couldn't be amended back to industrial. Councilmember Ihlan sug- <br />gested discussion by the City Council on a policy defining their vision for this <br />area, given previous discussions by the Comprehensive Plan Steering Com- <br />mittee, as well as the Parks and Recreation Master Planning advisory group <br />identifying the need for additional Parks/Open Space in the southwest portion <br />of Roseville. Councilmember Ihlan advocated for seizing the moment and <br />putting forth a vision. <br />Mayor Klausing opined that he was hesitant to discuss such a change when <br />the property owner had given no indication of any interest in zoning for high <br />density housing rather than industrial. <br />Public Comment <br />Dolly Nelson <br />Ms. Nelson spoke in support of more park space in that area of Roseville; not- <br />ing the removal by other communities of industries near rivers and their rede- <br />velopment into recreational and housing uses. Ms. Nelson opined that this <br />parcel was a great opportunity for Roseville to do the same, with being adja- <br />cent to a golf course but not a responsibility of the City for maintenance and <br />upkeep, but allowing the City to benefit from an adjacent parcel. <br />Ms. Nelson advised that she had additional comments related to the proposed <br />bituminous asphalt plant. <br />Carol Kester, 1739 Eldridge Avenue W <br />Ms. Kester addressed the site at Terminal Road and Walnut Street as a poten- <br />tial site for a bituminous asphalt plant and provided her concerns related to the <br />high level of pollution already present in this area of the business community, <br />being adjacent to several major highways and their traffic; and the potential <br />for additional noise and air pollution, in addition to hazardous materials stored <br />outside on the site and air contaminants from that use. <br />Mayor Klausing clarified that there was no proposal before the City Council <br />for that site on tonight's agenda. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.