My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_0809
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_0809
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2010 1:41:29 PM
Creation date
8/17/2010 1:41:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/9/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, August 09, 2010 <br />Page 10 <br />language allowed for working twenty-four hours to complete the job, the contrac- <br />tor(s) chose not to do so in consideration of area residents. <br />Councilmember Roe suggested an alternate approach for consideration, in limit- <br />ing the variance to the north side of Highway 36, which could address some of <br />Ms. Atkins' concerns; and questioned how such an approach would impact the <br />completion schedule. <br />Mr. Arndt expressed willingness to accept such an approach rather than a shorter <br />variance timeframe and the need to revisit the schedule. Mr. Arndt advised that <br />limiting work to 'the area north of Highway 36 was acceptable unless there was a <br />substantial run of bad weather necessitating working longer to facilitate the sche- <br />dule. However, he noted that the primary contractor, Lunda, would be working <br />twenty-four hours while tearing down the bridge itself in order to comply with <br />MnDOT contract requirements to reduce traffic impacts. <br />Councilmember Ihlan requested more specific start/end times that would address <br />avoiding noisy work during early and/or later hours of that variance time; and also <br />expressed concern with the length of the variance time; suggesting that the va- <br />riance be grated for a month with further extension time requested at which time <br />any issues would be addressed and the variance adjusted as applicable. Council- <br />member Ihlan advised that she would be willing to support the variance with more <br />specific conditions built into an adjusted schedule. <br />Klausing moved, Roe seconded, granting the variance request to City. Code Sec- <br />tion 405.03, to allow extended work hours, specifically north of Highway 36, with <br />a start time of 5:00 a.m. on weekdays, and 8:00 a.m. on Saturdays. <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke in opposition to the motion without more conditions <br />applied. <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in support of the motion, while recognizing the concerns <br />of Councilmember Ihlan and those residents concerns, while providing a balanced <br />approach to getting the project completed for benefit of the entire community. <br />Councilmember Roe noted his consideration of a condition excluding pile driving <br />during the extended hours. <br />Ms. Bloom advised that Lunda was the primary contractor controlling the job site <br />and responsible to address pile driving, with Arndt Construction, as the requester <br />of the variance, only involved in earth work and not doing any pile driving. Ms. <br />Bloom clarified that the variance would be applicable to any contractor(s) on the <br />job site; and that it would be too difficult for the Police Department, in responding <br />to any complaints, to identify the specific contractor(s). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.