My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0221_minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda/Minutes
>
2001
>
2001_0221_minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2010 1:35:03 PM
Creation date
8/26/2010 1:34:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Charter Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/21/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
March 1, 2001 <br />Note to /Vicky Lorenz <br />Jack Brewer <br />RE: Section 5.02 Initiative and Referendum <br />There was some discussion of Section 5.02 after the motions <br />to divide it into two separate sections were made, as noted in <br />the minutes. I have replayed the videotape three times and <br />find that there were no amendments, friendly or otherwise, or <br />no new motions to change the original language of the motions <br />that were made. I did, however, give a title to 5.03, since <br />this was not included in the motion, but mentioned in the <br />discussion. I'm just mentioning this, in case any questions <br />come up next month. <br />I personally feel these separate sections should be retained <br />as they were approved. Renumbering the sections of Chapter 5 <br />should not be a problem, especially since we will be <br />considering adding a section on expenditures. I doubt if <br />sections of Chapter 5 are mentioned in the rest of the model <br />charter. If they are I think we can handle it. <br />• <br />~~~ <br />r-G rr~ u s e.., w ~ ~~ <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.