My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001 Communication on Charter Commission
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Charter Commission
>
Other Communications
>
2001 Communication on Charter Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2010 10:57:35 AM
Creation date
9/13/2010 10:56:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Charter Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Coversheet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
deems <br />necessary. Other statutory and charter provisions requiring budgeting of, <br />or <br />limiting, expenditures do not apply to charter commission expenses. The <br />council may levy a tax in excess of charter tax limitations to pay such <br />expenses. <br />410.10, Subd. 4. Rejection; later proposals. If any charter so <br />submitted be rejected the charter commission may propose others from time <br />to time until one is adopted. <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: neal.beets@ci.roseville.mn.us [mailto:neal.beets@ci.roseville.mn.us] <br />Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:28 PM <br />To: Carolyn.Curti@ci.roseville.mn.us; <br />Christine.butterfield@ci.roseville.mn.us <br />Cc: margaret.driscoll@ci.roseville.mn.us; tim.pratt@ci.roseville.mn.us; Joel <br />J. Jamnik <br />Subject: RE: Charter Commission <br />1. Suggest you call Jack and remind him that if he wants media <br />distribution of Charter Comm'n press releases, that is the Comm'n's <br />responsibility. -- Though I suppose if distribution is just a matter of <br />putting the Comm'n's PR in a mail slot or existing media pick-up point at <br />City Hall, we could do that once he tells us he wants us to do that. But <br />some more involved, or more expensive, distribution process is the <br />Commission's responsibility, not ours. We can facilitate and help support, <br />but not actually do it for them - unless, as noted, doing for them simply <br />consists of placing the PR in a slot or box. <br />2. Our research is not definitive about the City Council's intent in <br />paying for the cablecasting at City expense of Commission meetings. Council <br />clearly approved it, but the record is unclear if they were approving it <br />forever or intended a year-by-year review and approval. I suggest we <br />continue cablecasting at our expense and I will put the issue of continuing <br />our City cablecasting at no expense to the Commission on a Council agenda, <br />probably in January or February so as to avoid any possible zig-zag in <br />Council direction. <br />Okay with all? <br />Neal <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Curti, Carolyn <br />Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 9:23 AM <br />To: Beets, Neal; Butterfield, Christine <br />Cc: Driscoll, Margaret; Pratt, Tim <br />Subject: Charter Commission <br />Neal and Chris, <br />Yesterday I emailed you a press release concerning the Charter <br />Commission that Jack Brewer sent to me. I assumed he sent it to me for <br />information only. Margaret raised the question whether I was responsible to <br />send it to the media....2 assumed not and want your feedback before I call <br />Mr. Brewer. <br />It's my understanding that the City allocated funding to cablecast <br />the Charter Commission meetings. Does that funding continue indefinitely? <br />Does the Commission change/continue after the ballot question failed? <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.