My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2000 League of Women Voters position on Charter Commission
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Charter Commission
>
Other Communications
>
2000 League of Women Voters position on Charter Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2010 2:01:32 PM
Creation date
9/13/2010 2:01:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Charter Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Coversheet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
New book: Democracy Derailed Comments from David Broder <br />Despite its popular appeal and reformist roots, this method of lawmaking. is <br />alien to the spirit of the Constitution and its carefully crafted set of checks and <br />balances... though derived from acentury-old idea favored by the Populist and <br />Progressive movements as a weapon against special-interest influence, the initia- <br />tive has become a favored tool of interest groups and millionaires with their <br />own political and personal agendas. <br />[They] have learned that the initiative is a more efficient way of achieving <br />their ends than the cumbersome and often time-consuming process of supporting <br />condidates for public office and then lobbying to pass legislation. <br />It is clear that the initiative process has largely discarded its grass-roots ori- <br />gins. It is no longer merely the province of idealistic volunteers who gather sig- <br />natures to place legislation of their own devising on the ballot. <br />Billionaire Paul Allen, cofounder of Microsolft, spent more than $8 mil- <br />lion in support of a referendum on a new football stadium fo the Seattle Sea- <br />hawks. Allen, who was negotiating to buy the team, even paid the $4 million <br />cost of running the June 1997 special election-- in which Washington state <br />voters narrowly agreed to provide public financing for part of the $425 mil- <br />lion stadium bill <br />Like so many other aspects of American politics, the initiative process has be- <br />come big business. Lawyers, campaign consultants and signature-gathering firms <br />see each election cycle as an opportunity to make money on initiatives that, in <br />many cases, only a handful of people aze pushing. [In 1998, more than $250 mil- <br />lion was spent in this lazgely uncontrolled and unexamined arena of politics.] <br />Money is almost always a major or dominant factor. The majority of the 200 <br />petitions for statewide initiatives circulated in 1997 did not make it. The single <br />obstacle that eliminated most of them was the ready cash needed to hire the <br />companies that wage initiative campaigns. [$92 million was spent on a battle in <br />California over legalizing casino gambling on Indian land.] <br />"When I began researching the initiative process, I was agnostic about it. But <br />now that I've heazd the azguments and seen the initiative industry in action, the <br />choice is easy. I would choose James Madison and the Constitution's checks and <br />balances over the seductive simplicity of an up or down vote. Our experience with <br />direct democracy during the last two decades is that wealthy individuals and spe- <br />cial interests have learned all too well how to subvert the initiative process to their <br />own purposes." <br />"Admittedly, representative government has acquired a dubious reputation to- <br />day. But as citizens, the remedy isn't to avoid our elected representatives. The <br />best weapon against the ineffective, the weak and the corrupt is in our hands <br />each Election Day." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.