Laserfiche WebLink
EREa section 1~a4,al ~A}~ ~a~imum Total surface Area} alla~vs <br />impervious surfaces on up to 3a°Io ofi the tatl iot area} and <br />VI~HEREA, the Relishes seek to increase the impervious coverage by 154 square <br />Feet to 43:5°Ia ofthe lot, requiring a v~~~~~~~ of 17345 square feet; and <br />I~ERE~, the ~Tariance Board has concluded that '`hardships" are present and <br />support can be given to deviate from the strict requirements of the Roseville City Code; <br />~l~~V T~EREF~RE BE IT RES~L~ED, by the Roseville Variance Board, to <br />approve a 17-foot ~~~~~~~ to Section 1 a04,a 1 ~ of the City Code and a 1,45-square- <br />faot v~~~~~E to Section 1004.41 ~A}~ of the City Code, subs ect to the following <br />conditions <br />~. The proposed add~tlon shall be conslsten.t In s1Ze and lacat~on 1t~1 the site <br />plan included with this staffreport as Attachment D and be limited to 1 ~ <br />feet in depth from the existing building v~all; <br />b, The applicant shall continue to work with Community Development staff <br />to masiC the appearance of the upper level addition on the split-level harne <br />through utilization of structural materials a well as landscaping; <br />c. The irr.~perviaus coverage on the property shall not exceed 43,25°Io ofthe <br />overall lot area; <br />d~ Storm v~ater runoff shall be limited to the level consistent v~ith 3 D°Io <br />impervious coverage; depending on the soils and slopes an the property, <br />such reduction. could be accomplished by directing rain g~.tters toward the <br />interior of the lot, installing and maintaining a "rain garden" filtration <br />basin, or some combination of these ar other measures as approved by the <br />City Engineer. Building permits shall not be issued until the City Engineer <br />has approved the storm v~ater mltlgat~on plans; and <br />e, The variance shall expire ~ months of the approval date rf a building <br />permit is not Issued, pursuant to § 10 l 3,.03 of the City Code. <br />The mot.ian for the adoption of the foregoing resolutio~l was duly seconded by <br />I1~ember Baerigter and upon vote being tal~en thereon, Nlerr~bers Boerigter and Doherty <br />voted in favor; <br />and none voted against; <br />HEREUPO said resolution vas declared duly passed and adapted. <br />Page ~. of 3 <br />