Laserfiche WebLink
V~HEI~EAS, Ms. C~ero~d tibal seek to expand the existing elevated, attached <br />deck such that it ~rauld encraaeh an additional S feet inta the required 30~foat setback; <br />requiring ~ 20-foat variance} and <br />HEI~A, the Planning Division has concluded that "hardships" are present and <br />support cap be given to deviate from the strict requirerrient of the Roseville City Code; <br />New THEI~EF~RE BE IT RI~OL~TED, by the Roseville ~arianee Board, to <br />APPR~~~ a 2DI-fact VARIANCE to Section Da4.01~ ofthe City code, sub~eet to the <br />fa~lowing candltions. <br />a The southernmost extent of the deck addition shall rerriain a mini~nur~ of <br />9~.7~ fect dram the rear property line; <br />b Neither sha11 the deck be enclosed nor. shall a freestanding enclosure be <br />situated an the deck; and <br />c The variance shall expire ~ months of the approval date if a building <br />permit is nat issued, pursuant to 1 a 13.3 of the City Cade. <br />The matian far the adoption of the foregoing resolution. v~ras duly seconded by <br />Member ~aerigter aril upon vote being talon thereon, the fol~o~ving voted in favor: <br />Members Best, Baerrgter, and Doherty, <br />and Wane voted against. <br />wHERE~JP~N said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />