Variance Board Resolution 73 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

~IB~EA, the existing. principal structure is 2,8 feet from the sauthern praperty 1i~ne, requiring a ~.2~faat variance; and I~~R~A, Section 1.0~4.~ 1 ~Drive~ay etbacks~ requires a -foot driveway setback from side property lined and ~V~~REA~ fir. and Il~rsr K~rt~ seek to reduce the existing. drivea~ to achieve a setback of ~,8 feet clang the southern property line, requiring a ~~~-faot variance, v~hich distance is consistent with the nonconforming setback of the ex~st~ng pr~nc~pal structure; and WHEREAS, the Planning 1~~vislon has concluded that "hardships" are present and support can be given to deviate from the strict requirei~er~ts of the Roseville City Code; I~~VV TH~REFOR~ B~ ~T IS~LVED, by the Roseville Variance Board; to APpR~VE a 7~Z-foot VARIANCE to ect1an 1 aa4.al ~ of'the City Code A1~Il ~.2-foot VARIA~[CE to section 1~a4.01~ of the City Code, subject tQ the folla~ving conditions: 1. Paverr~ent ser~ln the garage must achieve a separation of at least 2. feet from the southern property line prior to January 1, 2~a8; 2. The width of the dri~e~vay at the front property line must be lirrrlted to ~~ feet, pursuant to 7a~,~4B ~Drive~vay Standards} of the City Code; 3. Because ~02.0~ Parking on Boulevard Prohibited of the City Code prohibits the creation of a parking space on the part of a drivev~ay that lies within a street right-af~v~ay, the u,n-permitted concrete parking Space that has been recently paved ~n the youth C~asso Boulevard right-of ray must removed prior to January 1, 2~a~; and 4~ The variance shall expire ~ months frorrr the approval date if an appropriate driveway permit ~s not issued, pursuant to ~ l ~ 13.03 of the City Code. The notion far the adoption. of the foregoing resolution vas duly seconded by Member Boerigter and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Boerigter,lVlartinsan, and Doherty. And none voted against; HEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Page 2 of 3