My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-09-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2010
>
2010-09-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2010 9:38:52 AM
Creation date
9/24/2010 9:28:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/28/2010
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
but that the contractor was looking at a more aggressive schedule to complete <br />both sides by November 30, 2010. <br />In explaining the contractor's rationale, Mr. Schwartz noted that work had been <br />slow to begin due to various utility issues, and that Ramsey County was currently <br />reviewing the potential traffic and neighborhood impacts with a more aggressive <br />work schedule. <br />Ms. Bloom advised that the reason for the extended work hour variance for the <br />Twin Lakes - Phase II prof ect was due to multiple contaminants being found at <br />the work site and their proper removal and disposal; and <br />would allow installation of the water main along the Tw <br />of-way on Prior Avenue and connecting to County Road <br />during the night and early morning to facilitate minimal <br />service to area businesses during that construction work. <br />Ms. Bloom noted completion of the w <br />commended the neighbors for their pa <br />removal of 3,000 of older lines. <br />and <br />current review of final plans for the <br />~tion of easement issues, at which time <br />;il for final approval to go to bid. <br />~-day audit of its storm sewer system by <br />th no written violations received.. Mr. <br />~~ receiving a written report in several <br />gat overall, it was very construction and <br />f, and should also encourage the PWET <br />Roseville residents on the City's compliance efforts for <br />water <br />on of the MPCA audit clarified that it included discussion of all six (6) <br />minimum control measures; review of record keeping, with MPCA staff going <br />through that documentation; reviewing forms and processes; and included a tour <br />of City facilities; street sweeping practices; and a field tour of four (4) open <br />permits in the City; and thorough review of best management practices for pre <br />and post construction activities. <br />Mr. Schwartz advised that items of note in the verbal comments received from <br />MCPA staff included suggestions on areas where consistency could be improved; <br />where staff resources were committed and whether those resources were <br />adequate, noting that the City's resources were tight, but still received favorable <br />comments on day-to-day operations and comparables to other metropolitan <br />communities. <br />at the variance <br />Parkway right- <br />completed <br />~n of water <br />Page 3 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.