2010-07-27_PWETC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

but that the contractor was looking at a more aggressive schedule to complete both sides by November 30, 2010. In explaining the contractor's rationale, Mr. Schwartz noted that work had been slow to begin due to various utility issues, and that Ramsey County was currently reviewing the potential traffic and neighborhood impacts with a more aggressive work schedule. Ms. Bloom advised that the reason for the extended work hour variance for the Twin Lakes -Phase II project was due to multiple contaminants being found at the work site and their proper removal and disposal; and noted that the variance would allow installation of the water main along the Twin Lakes Parkway right- of-way on Prior Avenue and connecting to County Road C to be completed during the night and early morning to facilitate minimal disruption of water service to area businesses during that construction work. Ms. Bloom noted completion of the water main project on Churchill Avenue and commended the neighbors for their patience during this project for successful removal of 3,000 feet of older lines. Further items of discussion included the current review of final plans for the Fairview Pathway project pending resolution of easement issues, at which time the project will go before the City Council for final approval to go to bid. Mr. Schwartz summarized the City's two-day audit of its storm sewer system by the MPCA; and the favorable results, with no written violations received.. Mr. Schwartz advised that the City would be receiving a written report in several months on areas for improvement, but that overall, it was very constructive and performed in a way that encouraged staff, and should also encourage the PWET Commission and Roseville residents on the City's compliance efforts for stormwater management. Discussion of the MPCA audit clarified that it included discussion of all six (6) minimum control measures; review of record keeping, with MPCA staff going through that documentation; reviewing forms and processes; and included a tour of City facilities; street sweeping practices; and a field tour of four (4) open permits in the City; and thorough review of best management practices for pre and post construction activities. Mr. Schwartz advised that items of note in the verbal comments received from MCPA staff included suggestions on areas where consistency could be improved; where staff resources were committed and whether those resources were adequate, noting that the City's resources were tight, but still received favorable comments on day-to-day operations and comparables to other metropolitan communities. Page 3 of 11