My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-07-27_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
2010-07-27_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2010 9:09:57 AM
Creation date
9/30/2010 9:09:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/27/2010
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
^ Help to minimize blowing of material Annual report on what <br />happens to material <br />Environmental Benefits Additional Services <br />^ Wide range of material picked up and HHW collection that's easy <br />marketed to its highest and best use Organics collection <br />^ Materials are efficiently recycled (local Businesses included <br />markets, highest and best use for Anticipate future markets and <br />materials) new end products that would <br />^ Experience with Zero Waste events lead to collection of additional <br />^ Environmentally Preferred Purchasing material <br />(EPP) Rewards for adding value <br />Members reviewed, both individually and corporately, the list and determined <br />those items needing further clarification and/or combined with another category. <br />Discussions included intent of those values and overall benefits; environmental <br />issues versus efficiencies of the program; preference that products entering the <br />recycling stream become useful products at the end of the process; route <br />efficiencies and frequency; need to establish a threshold for the RFP while <br />allowing for flexibility and creativity among vendors; and keeping those options <br />open for the benefit of the City and its residents. <br />Further discussion included the Commission's interest in collection of compost by <br />vendors on bicycles; range of materials; collection criteria; environmental <br />benefits; convenience of collection; service to businesses and multi-unit <br />properties; separation of colored glass; need for the City Hall Campus and City- <br />owned and/or operated facilities to initiate EPP; considerable interest of members <br />in the ongoing educational aspects of a program for residents; knowledge of end <br />markets by large and small vendors and closing the loop for sustainability; <br />following the market of Roseville's recycled materials as part of the best value <br />process; and how to determine the success of the recycling program based on <br />participation by residents. <br />Additional discussion included business models of hauling companies as opposed <br />to recycling companies; marketing as a goal of environmental stewardship; <br />additional information needed from staff for review by the members to facilitate <br />their desire to recommend and encourage the City Council to consider adopting a <br />policy for implementing an EPP program in order to put value on the City's <br />recycling program; identification by individual vendors of who they market <br />materials to and whether the end use is sustainable or only aone-time re-use and <br />points weighted according to how often materials can be recycled. <br />Further discussion ensued related to the need to pare the list to ensure it was not <br />so detailed that it didn't address those significant items or become too <br />complicated; environmental benefits of local or metropolitan area companies for <br />Page 5 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.