My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-07-27_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
2010-07-27_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2010 9:09:57 AM
Creation date
9/30/2010 9:09:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/27/2010
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
u~~,, t„ ~. ~ t,~,», ; „~~.,.rt~U;r~~ <br />Materials are efficiently recycled (local markets, highest and best <br />use for material) 10 <br />uur~r ~„»~„t;,,,,, t~ rt ~~ <br />R„~,.,.~~~~~ ; ~.1„~,1~~,1 <br />Rewards for adding value 5 <br /> <br /> <br />Outreach 30 <br />Frequent education of residents 40 <br />Community involvement 10 <br />Annual report on what happens to material 50 <br />Environmental Benefits 10 <br /> <br /> <br />Experience with Zero Waste events 10 <br />Equipment doesn't use fossil fuel 30 <br />Environmentally Preferred Purchasing (EPP) 30 <br />Local vendor-terminal location 30 <br />Outreach <br />Member Stenlund noted that the annual report was of vital importance to him. <br />Member Vanderwall noted that the educational component versus community <br />involvement was most important to him, meaning frequent education proactively <br />lead by the vendor; with residents recycling correctly being recognized as an <br />example or challenge to potential recyclers. <br />Member Vanderwall advised that he would e-mail the completed document to <br />staff for distribution to all PWET members for one last review. <br />7. Budget Update <br />Public Works Director Schwartz briefly reviewed the City Council's progress on <br />the 2011 Budget; with work still underway on ranking programs and services; <br />additional clarification by staff through preparation of summary descriptions of <br />each program service; and subsequent development based on those rankings of <br />the City Manager-recommended budget. <br />8. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and financing discussion <br />Mr. Schwartz reviewed the background information provided by staff for the <br />City's ten-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) related to those functions within <br />the Public Works Department management realm. Mr. Schwartz provided maps <br />of major street, water, sanitary sewer, and storm water infrastructure systems in <br />the City that were supported by capital expenditure projects, requests, stresses to <br />resources, and ultimate funding. <br />Page 7 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.