My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0108_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_0108_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 4:09:52 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:27:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Excerpt <br />City of Roseville Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes <br />December 13, 2000 <br />6b. Plannin� File 3232: A request by the City of Roseville to amend the <br />Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of the Twin Lakes Redevelopment <br />Area from its current designation of Business (B) and Industrial (I) to Business <br />Park (BP), a new land use designation. The Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area is <br />generally located east of Cleveland Avenue, west of Lincoln Drive, south of <br />County Road C2 and Brenner Avenue, and north of County Road C. A map of <br />the specific parcels can be obtained from the Roseville Community Development <br />Department. <br />Chair Klausing opened the hearing and requested Cathy Bennett to explain the Twin <br />Lakes proposed amendment to the Master Plan as provided in staff reports dated <br />December 13, 2000. She reviewed goals and objectives and planning principles. Ms. <br />Bennett explained the history, the planning process, and presented the staff <br />recommendation. <br />Member Mulder asked if fiscal disparities were figured into the financial feasibility. <br />Member Mulder encouraged fle�bility. This is a vision. There is no specific proposal <br />"in the wings". Parking is important. How does the City get higher density/ramped <br />parking? There will be new drainage and parking designs needed. Cars can be screened <br />making a more open, inviting site. <br />Member Olson noted in Option 3 proposed housing along the north side. There may be <br />less of a mi�ng of uses. She noted that the CIP puts funding into Twin Lakes Parkway — <br />explain. <br />Member Cunningham asked if there was a demand for a hospital. <br />Chair Klausing asked how the pieces would fit together. Could the Commission identify <br />items that should be located there? Chair Klausing asked for detail about what the area <br />might develop into. <br />Member Rhody noted that this is a vision of a block of land uses which the City will <br />invite proposals for new land uses over the next 20 years. <br />Comments: <br />Steve Miller, Dominium Truck Terminal/Freight, 2750 Cleveland Avenue, noting staff <br />recommendation 3.5, asked what "intrusion" meant. What creates more of an intrusion, <br />trucking or the other uses proposed by the staff? Low building quality does e�st because <br />the trucking industry will not reinvest without clear-cut assurances from the City. <br />Trucking has economic hardships; diesel fuel is expensive; drivers are at $58.00/hour; but <br />the relocation costs much more. It adds cost and congestion to freeways. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.