My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0122_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_0122_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 11:04:57 AM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:36:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1989l1990 and did not appear to present any major issues for the adjacent <br />residential neighborhood. The subject properiy is consistent with its neighbors to <br />the north and south, while there is no immediate impact of compatibility to the <br />east due to Snelling Avenue. In the case of the single-family residential <br />neighborhood to the west and northwest, surge traffic is the main concern, <br />especially as bingo participants lea�e the site. <br />B. Impacts on traffic and public facilities: The Planning Commission has <br />concluded there will be no impacts to any public facilities except for traffic safety <br />concerns at both ends of Oakcrest (Oakcrest @ Fairview needs a signal light and <br />Oakcrest @ Snelling may someday not ha�e a median cut). The applicant has <br />indicated that e�ts from the parking lot are clearly marked. <br />C. Impacts on property value: The Planning Commission does not anticipate <br />properiy values dropping due to the use of 2525 Snelling Avenue becoming a <br />bingo hall and a 14,000 square foot commercial building ha�e been in the area for <br />at least 20 years. <br />D. Impacts on general health, safety, and public welfare: The Planning <br />Commission has concluded there are no anticipated impacts to the general health, <br />safety, and public welfare of neither the neighborhood nor the City due to the use <br />of the site as a bingo ha11. (Police records did not indicate any significant activity <br />in past operations. The typical bingo participant is female, over age 50.) <br />E. Compatibility with the Roseville Comprehensive Plan: The Planning <br />Commission has concluded the use of the properiy as a bingo hall is a compatible <br />business use to both the Roseville Zoning Code B-1 zone and the Comprehensive <br />Land Use Plan Business designation. <br />4.3 The Planning Commission voted (5-O) to recommend approval of the request by Capital <br />City Investment LLP for a conditional use permit subj ect to the proposal meeting the <br />conditional use permit criteria and subject to the following conditions: <br />A. Capital City Investment LLP successfully obtaining the only bingo license in the <br />City of Roseville. <br />B. Replaced roof top mechanical units must be screened per Section 1010.07 of the <br />Roseville City Code. <br />C. Parking lot lighting must be brought into conformance (foot-candles and <br />downcast lighting) with Section 1010.12 of the Roseville City Code. <br />D. Any signage for the bingo ha11 must meet the requirements of Section 1009.03 of <br />the Roseville City Code. <br />PF3282 RCA (012201) Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.