My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0122_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_0122_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 11:04:57 AM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:36:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br />DATE: O ll22/O 1 <br />I�M N0�-4 <br />D�ep�;�ent Approval: Manag�;�proved: Agenda Section: <br />/�� LAND LT�SE <br />Tte'm nescription: A request by Peter Vesterholt, 699 Heinel Circle, for a 5 and 23 foot variance <br />from Section 1004.02D (Mmimum Yard Requirements), 1016.22A1 (Non- <br />Conformities), and 1016.16 (Structure Design Standards) of the Roseville <br />Zoning Ordinance to allow construction of an attached garage into the required <br />side and front vard (street side) setback (PF3280). <br />1.0 REQUESTED ACTION <br />1.1 Peter Vesterholt, properiy owner of 699 Heinel Circle, has requested variances from Section <br />1004.02D5, 1016.16, and 1016.22A1 of the Roseville City Code to allow the construction a <br />527 square foot garage addition. The proposed garage addition would encroach into the <br />required lo-foot side yard setback (5 feet) and the required 30-foot front yard setback (23 feet). <br />2.0 REVIEW of REQUEST <br />2.1 Section 1004.02D5 (Dwelling Dimensions and Appearances and Height, Frontage, Yard <br />and Lot Area Requirements in R-1 Districts) requires a front yard setback of 30 feet for <br />the Vesterholt property adjacent to Heinel Circle. Mr. Vesterholt wants to eliminate an <br />e�sting (unsightly) shed and construct an addition onto his e�sting garage to improve <br />handicapped accessibility for his wife. The e�sting garage, 19 feet wide by 21 feet deep (399 <br />square feet) lies appro�mately 15 feet from the front yard (east) property line. The proposal <br />would place the garage approximately 7 feet from the front properiy line. <br />2.2 Section 602.06 (Parking on Boulevard Prohibited) states no vehicle shall be parked on any <br />boulevard adjacent to a public street. If a front yard setback variance is approved for the <br />additional garage encroachment a variance from this section in necessary to a11ow vehicles to <br />be parked within street right-of-way. Section 602.06A2 would a11ow an encroachment if the lot <br />undertakes a substantial improvement to the home, garage, or driveway. <br />2.3 Section 1004A2D5 (Dwelling Dimensions and Appearances and Height, Frontage, Yard <br />and Lot Area Requirements in R-1 Districts) also requires a side yard setback of 10 feet <br />for the Vesterholt property along the northeast property line. Mr. Vesterholt proposes to <br />e�tend the garage towards the northeastern side yard property line to create an additional sta11 <br />and enclosed storage area. The design and additional area will offer accessibility to stored <br />items and greater movement around vehicles. However, the proposed addition would encroach <br />five feet into the required lo-foot side yard setback. <br />PF3280 — RCA (012201) Page 1 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.