Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />S <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />1S <br />16 <br />11 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />�3 <br />44 <br />45 <br />�6 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />Sl <br />Extract of 1�Tinutes from Planning Commission mCetlll� of Januarv 10, 2001: <br />d. Flanning File 3279: A request by the Robert Witt for a variance from the <br />Section 1016 (Shoreland, Wetland, and Storm Water Management) to the <br />construction a 1,576 square foot walkout rambler with attached garage on <br />property located at 353 South Owasso Boulevard. The specific variances are: to <br />locate the structure within the required 75 foot shoreland setback; allow a greater <br />impervious area than the required 25%; and a 23 foot variance from Section <br />1004.02D (Minimum Yard Requirements) to allow a pre-e�sting detached <br />garage to be located in the required front yard. <br />Chairman Craig Klausing opened the public hearing and requested City Planner Thomas <br />Paschke to provide a verbal summary of the project report dated January 10, 2001. <br />Thomas Paschke explained the details of the site development and the history of the site. <br />The structure is not modem and does not meet current Codes. The parcel is six feet lower <br />than the road. There is a shared driveway with the owner to the west. He explained staff <br />findings; the owner did not create the hardship; a new structure can meet the current <br />building Codes; the shoreline setback would be 49 feet which is consistent with adjacent <br />properties; no alternative design could meet e�sting Codes; there appears to be no health, <br />safety, welfare issues. <br />Thomas Paschke explained the <br />of the footprint and the safety <br />feet, up to eight feet). <br />details of the proposal. Chair Klausing asked for details <br />concerns regarding side yard setbacks (minimum of six <br />Member Olson asked for details on the e�sting garage. The exterior will not match the <br />new home and will increase impervious surface. Thomas Paschke suggested re-siding <br />the structure to match. <br />Mr. Robert Witt stated the existing garage would be resided. To remove it would require <br />removal of trees. He does propose removal of the boathouse. <br />Chair Klausing asked for details of the shared driveway. Mr. Witt said a new shared <br />driveway would be constructed. <br />Member Olson noted that the MnDNR asked that trees be placed between the shore and <br />house (five new trees will be planted). <br />Member Wilke asked the height of the house (1 �/z stories). <br />There were no comments from the public. The hearing was closed. <br />Motion: Chair Klausing moved, second by Member Olson, to recommend adoption of <br />Resolution #3279 (an executed copy of which is attached), with findings and conditions <br />A through I, as outlined in said Resolution. <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />