My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0122_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_0122_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 11:04:57 AM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:36:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3.8 The storm water retention pond is proposed in the northeast corner of the parcel. <br />Landscaping comprised of shrubs and perennials, is proposed in the southeastern corner <br />of the parcel and adjacent to the entry (street access) and front of the structure. <br />3.9 Utilizing the standards listed in the B-1, Limited Business Zoning District, the following <br />requirements would apply to the site: <br />Floor Area Ratio <br />Front Yard Setback Structure <br />Side Yard Setback Structure <br />Rear Yard Setback Structure <br />Front Yard Setback Parkin� <br />Side Yard Setback Parkin� <br />Rear Yard Setback Parkin� <br />Building Height <br />3.9 <br />3.10 <br />4.0 <br />Code Requirement <br />1.0 (100%) or 39,477 sq. <br />30 feet <br />10 feed30 feet (street side <br />20 feet <br />30 feet <br />10 feet/30 feet street side <br />20 feet <br />Three stories <br />Proposal <br />ft. .56 (56%) or 22,304 <br />102 feet <br />) 18 south/35 north <br />47 feet <br />25 feet <br />5 feet south/31 north <br />NA <br />Single story walkout <br />B-PUD Difference <br />ft. Less density proposed <br />Greater setback than required <br />Greater setback than re uired <br />Greater setback than required <br />5 feet less than re uired <br />5 feet south less than re uir� <br />NA <br />NA <br />The proposed General Concept Plan, including site, grading/drainage, utility landscape, <br />and building elevations have been provided for the Commission's consideration. <br />Section 1008 of the City Code outlines the requirements and procedures for a planned <br />unit development. <br />STAFF CO�I��NTS & FINDINGS <br />4.1 The zoning of the site is R-1, Single Family Residence District. This zoning designation <br />is the residual zone from when single family homes used to occupy the area. In 1995 <br />Good Value Homes received approval for the development of 54 townhomes. The <br />development was approved as a planned unit development, however, it did not <br />incorporate the 2330 Le�ngton Avenue parcel. <br />4.2 The future land use for this parcel, as identified in Roseville's Comprehensive Plan, <br />indicates that this parcel should develop as High Density Residential (�ID). Currently the <br />lot is vacant, and over the past two years the Community Development staff has <br />discussed the sites potential for townhouse development with interested individuals. <br />However, none of these discussions ha�e ever been submitted for review. <br />4.3 Two hea�ily tra�eled roadways, State Trunk Highway 36 and Le�ngton Avenue, lie <br />adjacent to the parcel. Each roadway has an increasing volume of traffic that produces a <br />level of noise that is difficult to screen or block and peak hour traffic volumes that are <br />complicated to maneuver given the limited site access to Le�ngton Avenue from Lovell <br />Lane. <br />PF3277 — RCA (Ol/22101) Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.