Laserfiche WebLink
3.8 Building materials incorporate asphalt shingles on the roof and a mi�ture of brick, cedar, <br />and maintenance free siding on the building facade. The soffit and fascia will be <br />aluminum and the structure will be outfitted with gutters to properly remove roof <br />drainage. Each unit has front and rear doors, front, rear, and side (end units only) <br />windows and an entry overhang. <br />39 The storm water retention pond is proposed in the northeast corner of the parcel. <br />Landscaping, comprised of shrubs and perennials, is proposed in the southeastern corner <br />of the parcel and adjacent to the entry (street access) and front of the structure. <br />3.10 Utilizing the standards listed in the B-1, Limited Business Zoning District, the following <br />requirements would apply to the site: <br />Floor Area Ratio <br />Front Yard Setback Structure <br />Side Yard Setback Structure <br />Rear Yard Setback Structure <br />Front Yard Setback Parkin� <br />Side Yard Setback Parkin� <br />Rear Yard Setback Parking <br />Parking <br />Building Height <br />3.9 <br />3.10 <br />4.0 <br />Code Requirement <br />1.0 (100%) or 39,477 sq. ft. <br />30 feet <br />10 feet/30 feet (street side) <br />20 feet <br />30 feet <br />10 feet/30 feet (street side) <br />20 feet <br />62.5 or 511000 g.f.a. <br />Three stories <br />Proposal <br />.56 (56%) or 22,304 si <br />102 feet <br />18 soutl�/35 north <br />47 feet <br />25 feet <br />5 feet soutl�/3 1 north <br />NA <br />35 spaces or 2.5/1000 <br />Single story walkout <br />ft. <br />. f. a. <br />B-PUD Difference <br />Less density proposed <br />Greater setback than re <br />Greater setback than re <br />Greater setback than rf <br />5 feet less than require� <br />5 feet (south) less than <br />NA <br />27.5 spaces less than r� <br />NA <br />The proposed General Concept Plan, including site, grading/drainage, utility landscape, <br />and building elevations have been provided for the Commission's consideration. <br />Section 1008 of the City Code outlines the requirements and procedures for a planned <br />unit development. <br />STAFF C01�I1�IENTS & FINDINGS <br />4.1 The zoning of the site is R-1, Single Family Residence District. This zoning designation <br />is the residual zone from when single family homes used to occupy the area. In 1995 <br />Good Value Homes received approval for the development of 54 townhomes. The <br />development was approved as a planned unit development, however, it did not <br />incorporate the 2330 Le�ngton Avenue parcel. <br />42 The future land use for this parcel, as identified in Roseville's Comprehensive Plan, <br />indicates that this parcel should develop as High Density Residential (HD). Currently the <br />lot is vacant, and over the past two years the Community Development staff has <br />discussed the sites potential for townhouse development with interested individuals. <br />However, none of these discussions have ever been submitted for review. <br />PF3277 — RCA (02/12/O1) Page 3 of 6 <br />