2001_0312_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

A. Police Department: Police records, submitted by Tom Alleva, Roseville Assistant Police Chief, indicate that during the 1 8-month period from 7anuary 1, 1999 through May 29, 2000, there was a total of nine police calls (and 11 false alarms). According to Assistant Chief Alleva, during this time period there were no significant ca11s made to Taco Bell by the Department. B. Land Use Code Complaints: No land use complaints were received after the opening of the new Taco Bell. 2.4 Given the findings (no police or land use complaints), staff recommended that no amendment be made to PUD #1199 modifying the Taco Bells hours of operation. 2.5 For the current application, staff requested a list of the number of police ca11s to the Taco Bell properiy from January 1, 2000 to January 3 1, 2001. After review, staff concluded that there were a total of 24 incidents on the properiy, 14 (64%) of which were related to the building alarm. The remaining incidents were split between two follow-up ca11s, two public assistance, one vehicle lockout, one fire, one DWI, one theft by check, one transport, and one leaving the scene of accident. 2.6 In discussions with the Police Department, it was determined that none of the incidents (police responses) at Taco Bell were associated with the drive-thru or due to the hours of operation and that the police do not have any particular issue with Taco Bell. 2. 7 The Taco Bell is adjacent to two major roadways that carry 24-hour pass through traffic. Le�ngton Avenue traverses the City in a north south direction, while Larpenteur Avenue tra�erses the City in an east west direction. Both roads ha�e a functional classification of High Density Arterial and are not "local" roadways. 3. 0 HISTORY — SIGNAGE 3.1 Taco Bell signage for PUD #1199 was discussed at length with the Council approving facade signage at 10% of the area of the south building wa11 along Larpenteur Avenue and 10% of the west building wa11 up to 200 square feet. 3.2 In 1998 Taco Bell installed two signs (one facing west and one facing south) that are appro�mately 20 square feet in size (40 square feet total). The site does not have a pylon or monument sign and is not included on the Roseville Center signs. 3.3 Staff interpretation of the PUD is to limit signage to the south and west sides of the facade. 3.4 The pylon sign placed along Le�ngton Avenue stands 25 feet in height and lies appro�mately five feet west of the properiy line, consistent with the former sign. However, upon completion, Border Foods discovered that the new "center", and e�sting tree, and streetscape improvements, including trees, monuments, and bus/transit shelter, obscures the view of the Taco Bell as one tra�els south. PF3290 — RCA (03 1201) Taco Bell PUD Amendment Page 2 of 4