Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />Extract of 1�Tinutes from Planning Commission meeting of February 14, 2001: <br />c. Plannin� File 3288: A request by Brad and Randi Lundell, 1828 Ryan <br />Avenue for a variance to Section 1004.02D4 of the Roseville City Code to <br />allow the construction of a garage addition to encroach into the required <br />setback adjacent to a corner side yard property line. <br />Chairman John Rhody opened the public hearing and requested city planner Thomas <br />Paschke to provide a verbal summary of the project report dated February 14, 2001. <br />Thomas Paschke explained the variance request, noting he had received only one <br />communication, which was supportive. He explained the requested corner setback and the <br />driveway setback The structure was constructed in 1955 before the adoption of the City <br />Code. There is an identified hardship, not created by the owner; an accessibility issue within <br />the narrow garage; the starage space is not adequate. Staff recommended a variance to allow <br />a garage expansion of five feet toward (east) Faiiv'iew Avenue, with little impact on health, <br />safety and welfare. <br />19 Member Olson asked if there was public comment (one positive response). She asked for <br />20 details of the traffic and right-of-ways. Deb Bloom explained sight lines, impacts on future <br />21 right-of-way, safety, pathway construction on Fatrview Avenue and trees. <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />Chair Rhody asked Thomas Paschke to explain what options are a�ailable for a two-car <br />garage. <br />Thomas Paschke suggested using the Housing Resource Center for further information on <br />options. <br />Member Duncan asked if Lundells had agreed to the five-foot setback (yes). <br />No further public comment was offered; Chair Rhody closed the public hearing. <br />Member Olson suggested that the five-foot doesn't really provide much benefit. <br />Member Cunningham asked if there would be a rear yard setback issue (no). <br />Member Duncan asked for clarification on the music room setback (30 feet). <br />Member Olson asked for details on the lot coverage (less than 30% requirement). <br />Motion: Member Rhody moved, second by Member Cunningham to offer Resolution <br />No.3288 recommending approval with modifications, based on findings as stated in <br />the project report dated February 14, 2001 for the request by Brad and Randi Lundell, <br />1828 Ryan Avenue, for the following variances: <br />A. A 20 foot variance from Sections 1004A2D4 (Dwelling Dimensions and <br />Appearances and Height, Frontage, Yard, and Lot area Requirements in R-1 <br />