Laserfiche WebLink
� forth as a PUD? (no redevelopment is occurring). The building looks like a large <br />2 house, the large garage may be out of scale. (Lot coverage and garage size do not <br />3 apply to R-3A sites.) <br />4 <br />5 Member Olson asked for details of the garage access from Haddington. How big a <br />6 garage is allowed in an R-3A? Would the future garage provide a covered sta11 <br />� for each unit? <br />8 <br />9 <br />lo <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />1� <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />2� <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />Dennis Prokop, 2 180 Haddington, explained his plans to improve the building. <br />He will live in one unit. The garage in back would add privacy and separation <br />from the adjoining Goodwill drop off site. He was concerned about the exact <br />dimension of the setback It is appro�mately 9'-0" setback, but details will not <br />be known before a lot survey is complete. The four-car garage would a11ow one <br />car garage per unit (when added to the e�sting garage sta11). <br />Thomas Paschke suggested language such as "a 9' variance or as determined by a <br />survey prior to Council action". <br />Member Cunningham asked if the two existing garage stalls would remain as car <br />parking or living space. Prokop said he would use it for parking or storage. <br />Linda Prokop, 2180 Haddington, noted that the objective is to make the house <br />better and live there. <br />Lucille Eng, 22 13 Midlothian Rd., Haddington at County Road B, has another <br />apartment with garages east-to-west. Could this site be changed to a 25-unit <br />building? (Only through hearings and approvals by City Council). Thomas <br />Paschke explained the requirement of the Code allows for six units. Only the <br />corner (south, adjacent lot) is not single family. Traffic is a concern to the <br />neighbors, particularly if this is a large project.. <br />Chair Rhody closed the hearing since there were no further public comments. <br />Chair Rhody and Jim Mulder discussed garage size. (The Code allows for two <br />spaces per unit; one must be enclosed.) <br />Member Olson expressed concern about the lot coverage (50% of the lot or <br />.SFAR can be covered with structures). <br />Member Cunningham asked if the site could be raised; what is the maximum for a <br />new building (6 units). Member Wilke noted that changes would have to come <br />back to the Planning Commission for review. <br />A general discussion of lot coverage ensued. There appears to be no other good <br />options to rezoning to R-3A. <br />Page 3 of 11 <br />