My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0626_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_0626_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 10:25:26 AM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:37:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION <br />D A T E: OG/26/01 <br />ITEM NO: C— 3 <br />Manager �p� oved: Agenda Section: <br />it CONSENT <br />A request by John Goadding t'or a lo-foot Variance frorn Section 703.04B1a of the <br />Roseville City Code for property located at 3180 West Owasso Boulevard (PF3300) <br />1.0 REQUESTED ACTION <br />1.1 John Goodding is requesting a 1 0-foot variance from Section 703.04B la of the City Code to allow <br />a driveway apron in the public right-of-way to be increased from the required 26-foot maximum <br />width to a width of 36 feet. <br />2.0 BACKGROUND <br />2.1 Mr. Goodding owns the property located at 3 180 West Owasso Boulevard. The property is zoned <br />R- 1, Single Family Residential, and the Comprehensive Plan identifies the property as Low <br />Density Residential. <br />22 The City's Pavement Management Program and the reconstruction of West Owasso Boulevard <br />have prompted the variance request. <br />2.3 The proposed reduction of this setback will enable Mr. Goodding to retain his driveway in its <br />current location. <br />APRON WIDTH <br />Code Re uirement Current �Vidth A licant Re uest Variance Requested <br />26 feet 36 feet 36 feet 10 feet <br />3.0 STAFF COMMENT & FINDINGS <br />3.1 Section 703.04B 1 a requires a ma�mum driveway width of 26 feet in a public right-of-way. <br />Based on the proposal a variance is necessary to allow the e�sting driveway to remain. <br />3.2 Section 1013.02 requires the applicant to demonstrate a physical hardship and to demonstrate that <br />no practical alternatives exist that would reduce the need for a variance. <br />3.3 Variances may be granted where the strict enforcement of the literal provisions of the ordinance <br />would cause "undue hardship". The granting of a variance shall only occur when it can be <br />demonstrated that such an action will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />3.4 "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting a variance means the property in <br />question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official <br />controls, the plight of the land owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by <br />the land owner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />Specifically to this request: <br />PF3300 RCA (062601) Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.