2001_0723_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

B. The plight Of the land owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by tEte land owner: The circumstances contributing to the Peterson request arc caused by activities that occur at the National Guard facility. C: The variance, if grattted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: The proposed six foot ta11 fence will not specifically alter the essential character or the locality, nor adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare, of the city or adjacent properties. 4.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 4.1 Based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this report, staff recommends approval of the request for a variance from Section 1012.02b2 of the City Code, to allow an increase in the fence height from four feet to six feet for the front yard of properiy located at 222 North McCarrons Boulevard, subject to A. The wood fence must be set back a minimum of three feet from the front property line. B. The applicant must work with City Staff to incorporate additional landscaping (trees, shrubs, and perennials) adjacen�McCarrons Boulevard to break-up long expanses of fence and augment the e�sting landscaping. C. The applicant must work with City Staff to determine whether the fence must be constructed at an angle to provide better view of North McCarrons Boulevard when backing out of both garages. D. The fence must be constructed of cedar or redwood, or stained an earth tone color to accent the stone and wood material installed as a component of the recent North McCarrons Boulevard reconstruction project. E. The property owner must work with City Staff to verify the front properiy line either by exposing the properiy corner pins or by the provision of a survey prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION S.1 On 7uly 11,200 l, the Roseville Planning Commission Held the public hearing regarding the Peterson request. At the hearing no citizens addressed the Commission. Mr. and Nlrs. Peterson �vetc present to ask questions regarding the conditions of approval. The City Planner clarified the questions (see attached draft minutes). 5.2 The Commission recommended (7-O) to approve the Peterson request for a variance to Section 1012.02�2 of the Roseville City Code, based on the findings in Section 3 and the conditions (as modified at the meeting) in Section 4 of the project report dated July 11, 2001. PF3321 — RCA (072301) Page 3 of 4