Laserfiche WebLink
5.0 POLICY & FISCAL IMPLICATIONS <br />5.1 The Comprehensive Plan encourages the reinvestment in commercial and industrial <br />buildings, and the economic development plan encourages the provisions and recruitment <br />of companies that provide head-of-household jobs. Bonestroo is an engineering firm with <br />its headquarters office building on this site. Renovation of the building into office space <br />will create space for up to 80 engineers and technicians. Parking is adequate. <br />5.2 There are no fiscal implications (other than increases in value base on improvements) nor <br />any impacts to the e�sting city infrastructure. <br />6.0 STAFF RECONIN�NDATION <br />6.1 Based on the comments and findings outlined in Section 3 and 4, staff recommends <br />approval of variances from Section 1007A1A1a of the Roseville City Code for the <br />existin� structure and a mechanical room addition for property located at 2361 West <br />Highway 36, to bc located within 15 feet of the right of way of St. Croix Street and <br />within 30 feet of the West Highway 36 Frontage Road subject to the following <br />conditions: <br />A. The owner must submit an updated site survey, illustrating the e�sting building <br />the previous required setback of the building and the newly approved setback for <br />the e�sting and the mechanical room addition. It is assumed that no further <br />additions will be made on the south and west sides of the building and that no <br />further variances will be required or requested. <br />B. The e�terior building materials must match e�sting materials and or colors and <br />te�h.ires. <br />C. The new HVCA unit along the southwest wa11 must be screened with vegetation <br />and the building additional must have a landscape plan (prior to issuance of a <br />building permit.) <br />7.0 PLANNING COI�ZMISSION ACTION <br />7.1 On 7uly 11,200 1, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding <br />the Bonestroo variance request. No citizens were present to address the Commission. <br />Mr. Otto Bonestroo was present to answer questions. The Commission did as general <br />questions about the proposal, specifically, whether there was adequate parking on the site <br />to accommodate the change in use (yes). <br />7.2 The Commission recommended (7-O) to approve the request by Bonestroo & Associates <br />for a variance from Section 1007.01 A 1 of the Roseville City Code based on the <br />comments and findings in Section 3, 4, and 5, and subject to the conditions in Section 6 <br />of the project report dated 7uly 11,200 1. <br />PF3328 RCA (072301) Page 4 of 5 <br />