My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0723_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_0723_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2014 12:45:49 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:38:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6(d) Planning File 3328: A request by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik, and Associates, <br />2 Inc. for a Variance from Section 1007.01A1a of the Roseville City Code for <br />3 property located at 2361 West Highway 36 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />Chair Rhody opened the hearing and requested Thomas Paschke to provide a verbal <br />summary of the project report dated July 11,200 1. <br />Thomas Paschke explained that Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. has <br />requested a variance from Section 1007.0 1 A 1 a(Required Setbacks) from the Roseville <br />City Code far the e�sting structure at 236 1 West Highway 36 to allow the placement of a <br />21' x 20' mechanical room addition on the comer-south face of a structure that currently <br />encroaches into the required setback adjacent St. Croix Street and West Highway 36. <br />He noted that the e�sting building sets within the required setback, and there is a need <br />for additional HVAC for office uses. One option was HVAC placement along the south <br />face of the building. Another option is to place the addition along the southwest comer. <br />Staff recommended approval of setback variances along the south and west walls far this <br />specific addition. <br />Chair Rhody asked if there was adequate parking (yes) and whether materials will be <br />consistent (yes). Chair Rhody asked if there was starage space (yes). <br />Otto Bonestroo, BRA & Associates, explained that the building was on this site before <br />the Highway 36 expansion and probably met the Code at that time. <br />There was no public comment; Chair Rhody closed the hearing. <br />1�Totion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Duncan, to recommend <br />approval of the following variances: <br />A. A 25 foot variance from Section 1007 A 1 A 1 a of the Roseville City Code for the <br />e�sting and proposed structure adjacent St. Croix Street (from the west property <br />line); <br />B, A 10 foot variance from Section 1007.OlAla of the Roseville City Code far the <br />e�sting and proposed structure adjacent to West Highway 36 (from the south <br />properiy line), <br />based on the comments and findings in Section 3, 4, and 5, and subject to the <br />conditions indicated in Section 6 of the project report dated July 11, 2001. <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.