My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0910_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_0910_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 2:33:16 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:38:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3.9 "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting a variance means the properiy <br />in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the <br />official controls, the plight of the land owner is due to circumstances unique to the <br />properiy not created by the land owner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character of the locality. Specifically to this request: <br />A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if� used under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls: The Community Development Staff <br />has reviewed the official controls of the City for its potential impact on the <br />subject accessory building request and determined that the property cannot be put <br />to a reasonable use if required to meet the requirements of Section 1004.02A6 and <br />1004.02E of the Roseville City Code. The Community Development Staff has <br />determined that improvement to properiy is vital to sustaining a viable community <br />and in the case of NIr. Reichenbach the parcel on which his home was built has <br />some unique limitations (predominant setback & size of lot) that reduce a�ailable <br />options. Staff has concluded that it is reasonable to grant a lot coverage and <br />setback variance to allow the construction of more modern living space. <br />B. The plight of� the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not <br />created by the landowner: The Community Development Department has <br />determined that the Reichenbach parcel has some unique characteristics, such as <br />size and predominant setback that were not created by the property owner. <br />Specifically, in the case of the predominant setback, the City does not require a <br />front yard setback greater than 30 feet. Like wise, Ramsey County has reduced <br />its need for greater setbacks adjacent County Roads, especially as they become <br />more residential in character. <br />C. The variance, if grattted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: <br />The Community Development Department has determined that neither variance <br />request will alter the essential character or the locality, or adversely affect the <br />public health, safety, or general welfare, of the city or adjacent properties. <br />4.0 POLICY & FISCAL IlVIPLICATION <br />4.1 The Comprehensive Plan and the Roseville Housing Improvement Plan encourage <br />maintaining and improving residential properties and infrastructure, as well as <br />reconstruction and rebuilding of residential structures (and neighborhoods) throughout <br />the community. <br />4.2 There are no additional fiscal implications and no public infrastructure improvements or <br />e�ensions necessary. <br />PF3334 RCA (091001) Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.