Laserfiche WebLink
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall on Monday, the 24th <br />day of September, 200 1, at 6:30 p.m. <br />The following members were present: <br />and the following were absent: <br />Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. <br />A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE 60-DAY REVIEW PERIOD REGARDING A <br />REQUEST BY KENNETH DAMMAN FOR A VARIANCE TO SECTIONS 1004.O1A1, <br />1004.1A5 AND 1004.O1A6 OF THE ROSEVILLE CITY CODE FOR PROPERTY <br />LOCATED AT 1858 HAMLINE AVENUE (PF3342) <br />WHEREAS, an application was submitted by Kenneth Damman for consideration of <br />variances to Section 1004.0 1 A 1, 1004.1 AS and 1004.0 1 A 6 on July 17, 2001; and <br />WHEREAS, said application was reviewed and accepted as complete by the Community <br />Development Department on August 14, 2001; and <br />WHEREAS, said application was presented to the Planning Commission at their regular <br />meeting of September 12, 2001 and recommended a 60-day time e�tension to allow the applicant <br />to provide more complete information; and <br />WFEREAS, the 60-day review period expires on October 14, 200 1, thus creating <br />the need for a review e�tension; and <br />WHEREAS, city staff has requested a 60-day extension to the 60-day review period, <br />pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99, to allow the proper review and consideration of the Bauer <br />Home request. <br />NOW, TI�RFFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council (the "Council") of the <br />City of Roseville, (the "City"), Ramsey County, Minnesota, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes <br />15.99, the time line for agency review of the application of Kenneth Damman for consideration <br />of variances be e�tended for 60 days, from October 14, 2001 to December 13, 2001. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by <br />Council Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: <br />and the following voted against: <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />