2001_0924_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

more in size. The Code also does not go beyond a typical residential lot size when determining restrictions for accessory structure size and whether a larger lot warrants a larger accessory structure and whether the structure is compatible with the properiy and the adjacent neighborhood. B. The plight of � the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner: Advent Lutheran Church has created the need for a variance with their proposal for a 1,200 square foot accessory structure. However, the Church property has a rear yard allowance of 4,860 square feet, which the City Code does not contemplate. The parcel is large at appro�mately 226,512 square feet (5.2 acres) and is unique when administering Section 1004.01 of the Roseville City Code. C. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: The proposed 1,200 sq. ft. detached accessory building would not alter the essential character or the locality, nor adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare, of the city or adjacent properties. 5.0 STAFF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS 51 Section 1004.O1A4 reads: Requirements For Increasing 1�Taximum Size: The size of detached accessory buildings may be increased from a total of 864 square feet to a maximum total size of 1,008 square feet. A public hearing and approval of a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 10 13.0 1 of this Title, and provided all other applicable provisions of this Section are met, is necessary. Conditions may be attached to the permit to mitigate the impact on adjacent properties, including, but not limited to, increased setbacks, landscape screening, architectural color and detail requirements, drainage provisions, and limiting additional exterior storage. When reviewing an application for a conditional use permit, the Planning Commission and City Council sha11 consider the following criteria: I. Impact on tra�c. 2. Impact on parks, streets and other public facilities. 3. Compatibility of the site plan, internal tra�c circulation, landscaping and structures with contiguous properties. 4. Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties. S. Impact on the general public health, safety and welfare. 6. Compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 5.2 Staff has reviewed the development proposal with regard to the criteria in Section 10 13 .0 1.D of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance and concludes the following: A. The proposed detached accessory building will not create additional traffic nor the need for additional public facilities. B. The detached accessory building can be partially screened by placing appropriate PF3340 RCA (092401).doc Page 3 of 6