Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 26th day of November 2001, at 6:30 p.m. <br />The following members were present: <br />and the following were absent: <br />Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING A 2-1/2 FOOT VARIANCE TO SECTION 1004.O1A8 OF <br />THE ROSEVILLE CITY CODE ALLOWING A GARDEN SHED ENCROACHMENT <br />INTO THE REQUIRED FIVE FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR PROPERTY <br />LOCATED AT 2993 FAIRVIEW AVENUE (PF 3349). <br />\I7i7�D� A Q i........... T..l,.a,.,7 L.... _ ,_,.a_..1 .. 'f i/�► C--'' -----=----- - c'--`�-- i nn�. n� ♦ n _ � <br />YYL11:.l�.LiL`1J� J[L111GJ LG1SlZiLL llil5 1Gl1llGJLGl1 il L-1/L lUUI V�LC1dI1GG lU JCGLIUII 1VV`f:Ul�"1b �T <br />the Roseville City Code to allow the replacement of an existing garden shed 2-1 /2 feet from the <br />side (westj property line; and <br />WHEREAS, the Mr. Telstad's property is located at 2993 Fairview Avenue, legally <br />riPCrrihPri ac• <br />Lot 1, Block 2, Rohleder's Oak Grove, Ramsey Counry, Minnesota (PIN: #042923240025). <br />WHEREAS, Section 1004.01 A8 reads as follows: Minimum Setbacks: A garden shed <br />anciior an accessory building shall be set bacic a minimum of 5 feet fiom a side yard or a rear <br />yard lot line and a minimum of 6 feet from any other building or structure on the same lot or <br />parcel; and <br />WHEREAS, Mr. Telstad desires to place the new garden shed in the same location as the <br />Pvictinn e}�a� �i�l�inl� ic 7_1 /'7 iuu* ('-r..w. 4L.o �+.. .�«a.. 1: «.7 <br />..�.��...b �.�.,.. YY111V11 ., �-.,� �.,.,� ��.,�.. «�., vd��� �.,Tv�,c��y ��r��; a�,u <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the <br />variance request by Mr. Telstad and voted (5-0) to recommend approval of the request based on <br />findings outlined in Section 4 and 5, and the conditions stipulated in section 6 of the project <br />report dated 11 / 14/01. <br />